Author: avadmin

President Joe Biden has long been under fire for his financial relationship with China, and now a Republican-led House of Representatives is taking steps to investigate the matter further.

Recently on FNC’s “The Next Revolution,” Breitbart News senior contributor and Government Accountability Institute’s Peter Schweizer argued that the House should focus on China in particular because of the massive amount of money the Bidens have received from Chinese entities. Let’s take a look at why this issue is so concerning.

“I would focus primarily on China because this is truly frightening — and I don’t say that lightly,” he said. “We know based on the laptop, the emails, the U.S. Treasury Department suspicious activity report reports that have been released that the Bidens have received some $31 million from Chinese entities. When you look at the businessman that may that happen — that made those deals happen, Steve, all of them have links to the highest levels of Chinese intelligence, a gentleman.”

The Evidence Against Biden

The evidence against Joe Biden and his family’s financial dealings with China is rather damning. According to emails recovered from a laptop belonging to Hunter Biden, as well as U.S Treasury Department suspicious activity reports, Joe and his family have received more than $31 million from Chinese entities since 2017. Additionally, many of these payments were made through shell companies which makes it difficult to trace their origin or purpose.

Risks Involved

When it comes to foreign interference in our economy, there are always risks involved that must be taken into consideration. The most obvious risk is bribery, as foreign governments may seek to influence our leaders by offering them money or other incentives in exchange for certain favors or actions being taken on their behalf.

Another potential risk involves conflicts of interest; when individuals receive payments from foreign countries, they can potentially become biased toward them when making decisions that could affect international relations. Finally, there’s the risk of espionage; if someone has access to sensitive information due to their relationship with a foreign government, they may be coerced into sharing that information with hostile forces who could use it against us.

The Need for Investigation

Given all these risks involved in foreign interference in our economy, it’s essential that we take steps to ensure our leaders are not engaging in unethical behavior or putting our national security at risk. We need an impartial investigation into Joe Biden’s financial dealings with China so that we can get answers about where this money came from and what it was used for — and if necessary, put measures in place to prevent such activities from occurring again in the future.

TL;DR

It’s clear that there needs to be further investigation into President Joe Biden and his family’s financial relationship with China and its potential implications for US politics and security. This issue raises many questions about potential bribery, conflict of interests, and espionage which must be addressed before anyone can know for sure exactly what went down between the Bidens and Chinese entities—and what kind of impact this may have had (or will have) on US policy moving forward. Therefore, it is absolutely essential that an impartial investigation takes place so that we can get clarity surrounding this troubling situation once and for all.

On Saturday, former President Donald Trump began his 2024 presidential campaign by visiting the first two primary states, New Hampshire and South Carolina.

In his speech at the New Hampshire Republican Party’s annual meeting in Salem, NH, he expressed his excitement to be back in the state and reaffirmed his advocacy for New Hampshire as the first primary state in the nation. He also announced that Steve Stepanaek, who co-chaired his first presidential campaign in the Granite State, would be joining his team as a senior adviser. Let’s take a closer look at why this visit is so important for Trump’s campaign.

President @realDonaldTrump announces that outgoing chairman of the New Hampshire GOP, Steve Stepanek, will be serving as senior advisor for Trump’s 2024 NH campaign.

Watch LIVE https://t.co/tfCJIewSgV

Watch our coverage of President Trump’s NH speech: https://t.co/pQPI2fQLYV pic.twitter.com/wzIpDyGUPk

— Real America's Voice (RAV) (@RealAmVoice) January 28, 2023

Trump’s Support for New Hampshire Primary Status

In his speech in Salem on Saturday, Trump expressed strong support for New Hampshire’s status as the first primary state in the nation. He argued that other states have tried to take away from New Hampshire its place as “the most important political event of our time” but that he “will always fight to protect it.” This message resonates with Republicans across the country who recognize that having a secure position at the beginning of every election cycle gives New Hampshire an invaluable advantage when it comes to campaigning. Trump’s

Trump’s Campaign Team

In addition to expressing support for New Hampshire’s status as the first primary state, Trump also announced that Steve Stepanaek would become a senior adviser on his campaign team. This decision makes perfect sense given Stepanaek’s extensive experience working with presidential campaigns both in and outside of New Hampshire. As one of Mr. Trump’s most trusted allies, he will undoubtedly play an integral role in shaping both strategies and messaging during this election season.

BIG energy in New Hampshire today for @realDonaldTrump! God Speed to all those who try to beat him in the First in the Nation Primary! @TrumpWarRoom pic.twitter.com/pQ8xOUWPNT

— Karoline Leavitt (@karolineleavitt) January 28, 2023

The Significance of These Visits

Overall, these visits are hugely significant for President Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign because they mark its official launch and demonstrate his unwavering commitment to both New Hampshire and South Carolina—two critical states if he hopes to emerge victorious on Election Day 2024. By showing strong support for their respective statuses as first primary state and early primary state respectively, Mr. Trump is making an effort to reach out to Republicans all across America while simultaneously endearing himself to local voters in both states—a shrewd move indeed!

On Thursday, Republican Texas Rep. Pat Fallon is introducing legislation that seeks to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and ensure that only American citizens are able to vote in U.S. elections.

The Voice of The Electorate (VOTE) Act would specifically insert a new section into the law entitled “Prohibiting Registration of Individuals Not Providing Proof of United States Citizenship” and make it so that no state can register an individual to vote in a federal election unless they provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship. Let’s take a look at why this bill is so important for voter integrity in the United States.

“To be a citizen of the United States of America is to part-take [sic] in the governance of the most free and powerful society on Earth. As Democrats seek to allow those who are not U.S. citizens to vote in U.S. elections, I stand firmly against this dilution! In order to protect this sacred right, I have introduced The Voice Of The Electorate (VOTE) Act, which takes the necessary steps to ensure that American citizens alone decide the future of our nation,” Fallon said in a statement.

“Every time an American casts a ballot, we must remember the patriots who came before and fought to ensure our right as U.S. citizens to vote in free and fair elections. This must never be taken for granted,” he added.

What is Voter Fraud?

Voter fraud refers to any illegal activities during voting with the intent to influence or undermine the outcome of an election or referendum. It can involve anything from impersonation and voter registration fraud to bribery and coercion, as well as multiple voting or tampering with ballot boxes – all activities designed to manipulate election results and give an unfair advantage to one party over another.

In recent years, there has been an increase in cases involving non-citizens voting illegally due to a lack of proper identification checks at polling places; The VOTE Act seeks to address this issue by requiring states to verify citizenship before allowing individuals to register for federal elections.

The Need for Photo ID Requirements

Photo ID requirements have become increasingly popular among states as a way to prevent voter fraud and protect election integrity by ensuring that only those individuals who have proven their identity are allowed access at polling stations on Election Day – something that is especially important when it comes to protecting against non-citizen voting across state lines.

With Rep Fallon’s proposed legislation, every state’s chief election official would determine which documents are needed as proof of citizenship; these could range from passports and military IDs to driver’s licenses or birth certificates depending on each state’s specific regulations.

This would ensure that non-citizens are not able to vote while still making it possible for eligible voters who may not possess such documents due to economic hardship or similar circumstances to cast their ballots without being denied access based on their ability (or inability) to produce identification documents when requested by poll workers or other government officials at polling places across America .

TL;DR

The VOTE Act proposed by Rep Pat Fallon is a critical piece of legislation for ensuring voter integrity in our country today, and its passage will help ensure that only American citizens are allowed access at polling stations come to Election Day and beyond! This bill will also make sure that eligible voters who do not possess certain forms of identification documents due to economic hardship or similar circumstances can still cast their ballots without being denied access based on their ability (or inability)to produce proof when requested by poll workers or other government officials at polling places across America.

We urge lawmakers on both sides of the aisle to support this crucial bill so we can guarantee secure elections free from foreign interference! ​​​​​​​​

The United States Army has long been a leader in recruiting new soldiers, but this year they have exceeded expectations by reaching their recruitment targets for the fiscal year 2023. This is a result of service leaders’ increasing focus on recruiting and adapting to a more challenging target pool. Let’s take a closer look at how the US Army is meeting its recruitment goals.

The Army has added approximately 18,500 new soldiers to the ranks since FY2023 began on October 1st, according to Maj. Gen. Johnny Davis of the US Army Recruiting Command. In addition, there are over 13,000 recruiters currently in processing. With these numbers, it looks like the army could exceed its goal for this fiscal year.

To meet these goals, service leaders have had to make adjustments and changes to how they present themselves to potential recruits and broaden their base of recruits. This shift in tactics has become increasingly important as fewer and fewer Americans are eligible to join the military due to various age requirements or health issues.

“I think the Army is getting better at recruiting,” Thomas Spoehr, director of the Heritage Foundation’s Center for National Defense, told the DCNF. “They were complacent for a number of years and took it for granted that people come to them, and they’re now very much in the mode of reaching out to prospects than they were in the past.”

The Army has also taken steps to better understand its target audience by conducting surveys and interviews with potential recruits and their families in order to better tailor their message and make it more appealing for potential recruits who may not see military service as an option for them otherwise.

The Army also recently launched an interactive website specifically designed for potential recruits that provides information about different career paths within the military, as well as access to resources such as mentorships and scholarships that can help potential recruits reach their goals within the military.

It’s clear that the US Army is making strides when it comes to meeting its recruitment targets for FY2023 – a testament both to service leaders’ hard work and dedication towards achieving this goal, as well as their ability to adapt quickly when faced with a changing target pool of potential recruits. With continued effort from all involved, we can expect great things from our nation’s armed forces in the years ahead!

Kamala Harris’ omission of the right to life in her pro-abortion remarks on the 50th anniversary of Roe v. Wade is an affront to our nation’s core values and should not be taken lightly. By deliberately leaving out “life” from the Declaration of Independence, Harris showed her true colors as a radical left-wing politician who is willing to ignore fundamental rights in order to advance her own agenda.

This isn’t just a mistake or an oversight; it’s a calculated move by Harris to push her extreme views on abortion and erase any mention of the right to life that all Americans are supposed to share. It shows that she doesn’t care about protecting innocent lives, only about promoting her own beliefs regardless of what the Constitution says or how it affects those around her.

“We are here today because we collectively believe and know, America is a promise – it is a promise of freedom and liberty,” Harris said in her addres “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness” are natural rights.

“Not for some, but for all,” Harris continued. “A promise that we made in the Declaration of Independence that we are each endowed with the right to liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”

Kamala Harris, while giving a speech on abortion, leaves out the right to life when quoting the Declaration of Independence. pic.twitter.com/3zAOuDY8uJ

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) January 23, 2023

What makes this even worse is that Harris was speaking at an event commemorating the 50th anniversary of Roe v. Wade – a decision that has resulted in over 60 million abortions since its implementation. This shows how little respect Harris has for human life when she conveniently ignores one of our country’s most cherished principles during such an important occasion.

It also highlights how far some politicians will go to promote their agendas without regard for anyone else, including those whose very lives are at stake due to decisions made by elected officials like Harris. This type of rhetoric is unacceptable and dangerous, as it signals that our leaders don’t take seriously the importance of protecting life and upholding basic human rights – something they were elected to do in the first place!

Harris’ blatant disregard for humanity serves as yet another reminder that we can no longer trust those in power with our most basic freedoms and rights if they are so willing to ignore them when it suits their own interests and beliefs. In order for us to have a future where every person’s right to life is respected and valued, we must hold our leaders accountable for their words and actions, especially when they show such contempt for something so sacred as human life itself!

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has been under intense scrutiny from the Republican-led House Judiciary Committee for its alleged politicization and bias. On Friday, the DOJ notified the committee that it “may not always be possible” to comply with their investigative requests.

This news comes after Republicans issued formal requests to the department pertaining to investigations into certain school board meetings, their role in the southern border crisis, and other concerns about potential bias.

It is concerning that the DOJ may not be able to fully cooperate with congressional investigators due to a perceived need to “protect the integrity of its work”. While it is understandable that some information needs to remain confidential, if there is any evidence of corruption or political manipulation within the agency then it should be made public in order for Congress and citizens alike can hold our government accountable for their actions.

In recent years, there have been numerous reports of questionable behavior at the highest levels of government that have raised serious questions about how well those in power are conducting themselves. For instance, former Attorney General Jeff Sessions was accused by President Trump of being weak on immigration enforcement – a claim which he denied – while former FBI Director James Comey spoke out against what he saw as improper politically motivated decisions by President Trump during his time at the bureau.

Why’s DOJ scared to cooperate with our investigations?

— House Judiciary GOP (@JudiciaryGOP) January 20, 2023

And just recently William Barr’s tenure as attorney general has come under fire due to his handling of special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe and other matters related to civil rights issues such as police brutality and voting rights abuses. It appears now more than ever that we must ensure transparency when it comes to those in positions of power so they can be held responsible if they are found guilty of any wrongdoing or misconduct within their departments.

The DOJ must understand that Americans expect accountability from those who serve in government offices – regardless if they are appointed by Democrats or Republicans – and this requires full compliance with congressional inquiries whenever necessary. Furthermore, our elected officials must also recognize the importance of transparency when engaging with executive branch agencies since these organizations wield great influence over both domestic policymaking and foreign affairs alike; therefore we must make sure they are operating ethically and without prejudice towards any particular party or agenda item whenever possible.

Ultimately, it is up to Congress to determine whether or not there have been any improprieties at play within our government institutions so they can act accordingly if needed; however, if agencies like DOJ refuse cooperation then lawmakers will find it increasingly difficult to perform their oversight duties properly which could lead us down a dangerous path where unchecked power becomes commonplace among the federal bureaucracy.

Therefore, we should all take an active interest in making sure our representatives do everything necessary to ensure justice is served no matter what party holds office at any given time because our democracy depends on it for continued stability moving forward into an uncertain future ahead!

The Biden Administration’s plans to tackle climate change are downright alarming. The President’s special envoy, John Kerry, appeared at the World Economic Forum to push his no-carbon future agenda and warn of dire consequences should we fail to implement it.

“I am not convinced we’re going to get there in time to do what the scientists said, which avoid the worst consequences of the crisis,” he said, promoting a “no-carbon” future to prevent global temperatures from rising.

While there is certainly a need to reduce carbon emissions, this latest call for drastic measures has left many Republicans wondering if these extreme tactics are truly necessary or if they will even be effective.

Kerry’s predictions of doom appear far too pessimistic and give too much credit to those who have made pledges but have not yet delivered on them. After all, how can he expect the world to take him seriously when his own statements seem more like fear-mongering than anything else?

Moreover, blaming flooding in California as a consequence of climate change is misleading since natural disasters occur for many different reasons and cannot be solely attributed to environmental issues.

It doesn’t help that Kerry also lectured CEOs about their failure to recognize the destructive process of growth while praising those gathered in Davos for their efforts. This seems hypocritical considering how easy it is for some people and institutions–those with wealth and power–to avoid making meaningful changes while others suffer from the effects of climate change due to poverty or other societal disadvantages.

Ultimately, tackling climate change requires practical solutions that balance economic growth with environmental protection rather than radical ideas that could do more harm than good. It is time for both parties—Republicans and Democrats alike—to come together in order to find workable solutions that acknowledge the role humans have played in our current situation without sacrificing economic progress along the way.

It appears that Michael Bay is facing charges for an offense he committed while filming on location in Rome for his Netflix action thriller “6 Underground.” According to Italian authorities, a homing pigeon was killed on the set of Bay’s movie in 2018 – with Italian prosecutors attempting to hold him responsible.

Bay Denies Being Responsible

Despite these accusations, Michael Bay has denied any involvement or responsibility in the death of this pigeon. The “Armageddon” director has completely dismissed these claims as false and baseless. He has also called out what he believes to be an attempt by local authorities to use him as a scapegoat for their own issues.

This is not the first time that Bay has been accused of killing animals while filming – similar allegations were levied against him while making “The Island” back in 2005; however, those charges were eventually dropped due to insufficient evidence.

Is There Any Evidence?

According to a report from The Wrap, there is very little evidence linking Michael Bay directly to this incident – it is unclear where exactly the bird was found and how it died in the first place. Additionally, there are no witnesses or other direct proof which would indicate that Bay had anything to do with its death either intentionally or unintentionally.

While it remains possible that some kind of investigation will take place and more information will come out about what happened here, at this point all we know is what is being alleged by Italian officials – which may or may not be true.

What Is at Stake Here?

If convicted of killing this pigeon, Michael Bay could potentially face hefty fines and even jail time depending on how severe Italian authorities view this matter – though it seems unlikely they will actually pursue such drastic measures given their lack of evidence against him at this point in time. However, if they do find something along the way then they could certainly make an example out of him and send a message that animal cruelty isn’t tolerated within Italy’s borders.

Regardless of what happens next though one thing is certain: This whole situation doesn’t reflect well upon anyone involved – especially Michael Bay who stands accused but without any real proof behind those accusations so far.

In case you’ve been living under a rock and don’t know who Michael Bay is:

In recent years, award shows have become less about celebrating cinematic excellence and more about delivering political speeches. The left-wing agenda of the entertainment industry has gone from subtle to overt, and conservative viewers are increasingly tuning out.

This year’s Golden Globe Awards saw massive ratings drop as conservative audiences stayed away in droves. The problem is not just limited to this one show; the entire awards show landscape has been undermined by woke McCarthyism, and it is up to conservatives to push back against this trend if they want to see these shows return to their former glory.

What Is Woke McCarthyism?

Woke McCarthyism is the term used to describe the trend of using cultural events such as award shows to advance a left-wing agenda. This includes promoting extreme ideologies such as identity politics and critical race theory while attacking traditional values such as faith, patriotism, hard work, and personal responsibility.

In addition, many celebrities use their platform at these events to advocate for partisan causes or attack those who disagree with them politically. Hollywood elites have become increasingly vocal in pushing their own narrow worldview onto their audience without any regard for those who may disagree with them.

How Has Woke McCarthyism Hurt Award Shows?

Woke McCarthyism has caused immense damage to award shows on both creative and commercial levels. On a creative level, the focus on politics has taken attention away from celebrating the film itself in favor of pandering for political points with ideological homilies and virtue-signaling speeches that bore viewers instead of entertaining them. Furthermore, many talented artists are ignored simply because they do not fit into the accepted narrative pushed by Hollywood elites while conversely lesser performers are rewarded simply because they do conform to this narrative despite having little actual talent or merit.

As a result, these events have become an exercise in cynicism rather than an opportunity for genuine celebration or appreciation of great artistry.

On a commercial level, woke McCarthyism has eroded viewership significantly over recent years as conservative audiences tune out en masse due to feeling alienated by Hollywood’s heavy-handedness and lack of respect for traditional values or differing opinions from its own self-righteous ones. The numbers don’t lie; according to NBC’s preliminary figures, this year’s Golden Globe Awards had only 5 million viewers compared to last year’s 18 million when there was no speechifying involved either way politically speaking (source).

Similarly, Fox News reported that the 2019’s Academy Awards were watched by 29 million people whereas the 2020’s ceremony plummeted down 22 percent (source). This drastic decline highlights just how much conservative audiences have abandoned these awards shows due largely in part because of woke McCarthyism driving them away through its blatant politicization rather than focusing on honoring great cinema which should be its primary purpose.

President Joe Biden promised to be “the most transparent president in history,” but his administration has been anything but. The latest incident comes in the form of blacklisting certain members of the press from attending White House events.

Not only does this go against Biden’s promise for transparency, but it is also a flagrant attack on freedom of the press and American values.

Biden’s Blacklisting Tactics Reveal Hypocrisy & Contradiction

In recent days, several mainstream media outlets have spoken out about President Joe Biden’s blacklisting tactics when it comes to inviting journalists to attend White House events. Outlets such as Salon, Newsmax, and Washington Examiner were excluded from receiving invitations from the White House for Christmas events. Furthermore, some producers and technicians from CBS and Fox were also left off the list. This omission was expected to be rectified yet CBS was still excluded from a TV press event that same day.

A Veteran White House reporter told The Washington Post that these acts are an example of hypocrisy coming straight from Biden himself: “How many acts of petty blacklisting does this White House have to commit against accredited members of the news media before a consensus forms that President Biden is neither a champion of a free press, as he so frequently claims, nor a man of decency, as his supporters claim on his behalf?”

Another veteran correspondent spoke under condition of anonymity saying that their outlet had regularly received invitations since at least George W Bush’s era; adding that these snubs should be seen in context with previous actions taken by Biden regarding issues with press access: “It’s not just civility – it’s also about democracy really.”

They went on further to say that although publicly Biden espouses support for freedom and independence within the media – privately he takes punitive measures against them which is incredibly hypocritical: “This guest list is an example of how the White House is kind of taking punitive measures against journalists who are simply doing their job exactly as [Biden] says or claims he supports – and that’s what’s most infuriating…it’s doublespeak”.

Press Secretary Katrin Jean-Pierre has no problem cherry-picking questions for Biden which reveals another layer of hypocrisy coming out of this administration. Veteran reporters have expressed their outrage stating: “Engaging in petty partisan holiday invites is a sign of weakness, not strength…apparently this white house now has total disregard for protecting even the veneer if its promised transparency and respect for a truly free press.” – Why Does This Matter?

Freedom Of Speech & The Free Press Are Cornerstones Of Democracy

It matters because freedom of speech & freedom of information are cornerstones upon which democracy stands – they must never be compromised or attacked by anyone regardless of office or political affiliation! Denying access based on ideology or personal preference goes directly against those core values & sets a dangerous precedent! Allowing any leader (regardless of political party) to pick who can report what undermines our fundamental rights as citizens! Any attempt at censorship should never be tolerated & must always be fiercely opposed! It also sends the wrong message to other countries who may feel emboldened to take similar measures themselves thus eroding human rights around the world!

How Can We Hold Government Accountable If They Can Pick Who Reports On Them?

Accountability comes hand-in-hand with having access to information necessary to make informed decisions about our leaders! To effectively hold the government accountable, we need unbiased sources of unfiltered data – with all sides represented equally, able to contribute narrative debate without fear of retribution or suppression of ideas/opinions! Without the right level of access, we cannot guarantee accurate reporting nor deliver justice when those in power lead us down the path of corruption and deceit–both of which damage the integrity of the entire system itself!

What Can Be Done To Ensure Unbiased Access For All Reporters?

We need to ensure there are clear-cut rules and regulations governing how administration officials interact with the media—every outlet journalist should hold the same standards accountable, while also giving equal opportunity to cover stories important to them without interference from outside influence! There needs to be guaranteed protection for First Amendment journalists, ensuring they are not retaliated against for publishing stories deemed unfavorable by the powers that be.

Additionally, fair representation across the board is crucial to prevent favoritism in any one particular outlet over another—everyone brings something unique to the table and offers diverse perspectives from different communities across the country. Finally, open dialogue between parties is essential to keep lines of communication open and encourage collaboration and understanding of each other’s perspectives.