Author: avadmin

On Monday night’s episode of The Late Show, Stephen Colbert interviewed former White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain. During their conversation, they discussed President Joe Biden’s State of the Union address from earlier this week.

In an effort to make Biden look like a political genius, Colbert asked Klain if they had planned for the moment when the President falsely accused Republicans of wanting to cut Social Security and Medicaid. Klain responded that they had planned for it and that it was Biden’s best impression of Harry Truman. The problem with this narrative is that it is not true.

Klain said, “Look, if you don’t want to be accused of trying to cut Social Security and Medicare maybe you shouldn’t try to cut Social Security and Medicare. Okay, and so, you know, look, Harry Truman, you know, was called, ‘Give ’em hell, Harry’ and Harry Truman once famously said ‘I don’t give them hell. I just tell them the truth about them and it feels like hell’ and that’s what that moment felt like at the State of the Union.”

What Did Biden Say?

During his speech on Wednesday, Biden said “We can’t turn back now—and yet, too many Republicans in Congress want to return to the same failed economic theories that got us into this mess in the first place: They want to gut Social Security and Medicaid while giving more tax breaks to corporations already making record profits.” This statement is patently false. Not only do Republicans not want to cut Social Security and Medicaid, but many have spoken out against cutting those benefits for seniors.

The Reality Of Republican Policy

The reality is that the Republican Party does not want to cut Social Security or Medicare. In fact, many prominent Republicans have proposed legislation aimed at protecting or even increasing these benefits for seniors.

For instance, last year Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley proposed legislation that would increase Social Security benefits for about 8 million recipients by up to $1,400 per year. His plan was supported by a number of prominent GOP Senators as well as some Democrats in Congress.

Furthermore, a recent survey conducted by YouGov/The Economist found that 88% of Republican voters oppose cutting Social Security or Medicare benefits; only 7% support cuts to either program. These numbers demonstrate that most Americans—including most Republicans—do not support cutting these programs and instead favor policies that protect them or even enhance their benefits.

This week, United States Secretary of State Antony Blinken attended the Munich Security Conference in Germany.

As one of the first major diplomatic conferences since the Chinese spy balloon incident, it was an opportunity for representatives from both countries to come together and work out their differences. However, instead of focusing on diplomacy, Secretary Blinken took a more aggressive approach by issuing threats and warnings to China’s highest-ranking diplomat, Wang Yi.

In his meeting with Wang Yi, Secretary Blinken warned him that China should not provide any further military aid to Russia or else there will be consequences. He also demanded that China stop all activities related to cyber espionage and spying. This was met with a swift rebuke from the Chinese delegation who reminded Mr. Blinken that America has no right to interfere in internal Chinese matters. They also accused him of using the conference as an excuse to bully them into complying with his demands.

In addition to these warnings and threats, Secretary Blinken also used this opportunity to reiterate America’s stance on human rights violations in China and its opposition to Beijing’s policies in Hong Kong and Tibet. While these are indeed important issues that must be addressed, many feel that he should have focused more on diplomacy and finding ways for both countries to work together rather than issuing ultimatums.

According to HotAir:

As far as China’s relationship with Russia goes, it’s currently believed that China has only been providing non-lethal, humanitarian aid to Russia. But Blinken suggested that there may soon be evidence that Beijing plans to start offering military equipment and “lethal aid” to Putin. Blinken is saying that any such aid would have “serious consequences” for Sino-American relations.

But it doesn’t appear that China is very concerned about any further deterioration in our relationship, which is pretty much a dumpster fire at this point anyway. And there is some obvious duplicity in “demanding” that China not provide lethal aid to the Russians while we’re busy sending tanks to Kyiv and will very likely follow those up with fighter jets later this year.

President Joe Biden has recently made yet another embarrassing blunder during a speech at the White House. The president was announcing his plan to send 31 M1 Abrams tanks to Ukraine to aid their war against Russia when he stumbled over his words and could not recall Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin’s title. This latest gaffe is sure to have people questioning the current president’s competence and reliability.

This isn’t the first time that President Biden has found himself in an awkward situation due to a blunder. Just last month, he referred to Vice President Kamala Harris as “president-elect,” an embarrassing slip-up for sure. It’s becoming increasingly clear that the president has difficulty keeping track of his own cabinet members, let alone foreign leaders and countries around the world.

The president’s blunders don’t just raise questions about his competency, they also put into question his judgment when it comes to making decisions on important matters of state. If he can’t even remember who is in charge of the Department of Defense, how can we trust him to make decisions regarding our national security?

President Biden’s verbal flubs may be funny, but they’re not something that should be taken lightly. His poor word choice and lack of clarity are unsettling reminders that this president is not fit for office. He seems unable or unwilling to take responsibility for his mistakes or acknowledge their severity, which speaks volumes about his leadership abilities.

President Joe Biden’s recent blunder serves as yet another reminder that this president is unfit for office and lacking in basic competence and good judgment when it comes to making decisions about our national security. His verbal missteps are disturbing evidence that he is unable or unwilling to take responsibility for his mistakes or acknowledge their severity—a trait that does not bode well for a leader of a superpower nation such as ours.

It remains to be seen whether President Biden will learn from these gaffes or if he will continue down this path of incompetence and confusion while in office. Only time will tell if he can rise above these issues or if they will continue to plague him throughout his term as Commander-in-Chief.

Last week, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a huge victory for former President Donald Trump in his legal dispute with porn star Stormy Daniels.

This case was particularly noteworthy because it originally ruled that Daniels had to pay the former president $292,000 for his attorney’s fees after she sued Trump for defamation and lost. From what I understand, her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, filed the lawsuit without her permission. Let’s take a look at why this win was so important.

The court wrote in the original rejection:

“Viewed through the eyes of an objectively reasonable reader, the tweet here reflects Mr. Trump’s opinion about the implications of the allegedly similar appearances of Ms. Clifford’s ex-husband and the man in the sketch,” the court ruling said.

“Because the tweet juxtaposing the two images was displayed immediately below Mr. Trump’s tweet, the reader was provided with the information underlying the allegedly defamatory statement and was free to draw his or her own conclusions.”

The Case Against Daniels

The case against Stormy Daniels began when she sued Donald Trump in 2018 over a tweet he posted that called her “a total con job.” Initially, a federal court ruled in Trump’s favor and ordered Daniels to pay him $292,000 for his attorney’s fees related to the suit. However, Daniels appealed the ruling to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and argued that she should not have to pay these fees because Trump’s tweet was defamatory and therefore not protected by First Amendment rights.

The Ninth Circuit’s Ruling

Fortunately for President Trump, the Ninth Circuit rejected Daniels’ libel suit against him and threw out the case. His lawyers argued that the president’s tweet was not made as a factual claim but as an opinion about another user’s post. The court agreed with this argument and determined that since there were no facts presented in his tweet, it could not be considered defamatory or libelous under First Amendment law.

TL;DR

Trump’s victory in this case is yet another reminder of why freedom of speech is so important in our society today. By upholding President Trump’s right to voice his opinion without fear of legal repercussions, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has set an important precedent for future cases involving libel suits against public figures. It also serves as an example of how justice can prevail in our courts regardless of who you are or what your political views may be. We should all celebrate this victory for free speech!  ​​​

On Saturday, an unidentified flying object was shot down over Canada’s Yukon territory. The incident was detected by the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and resulted in a U.S. F-22 fighter jet being scrambled to intercept it.

Canadian Prime Minister Justice Trudeau took to Twitter to confirm that the object had been successfully taken down and that Canadian and American aircraft had been mobilized for the mission.

“I spoke with President [Joe] Biden this afternoon. Canadian Forces will now recover and analyze the wreckage of the object. Thank you to NORAD for keeping the watch over North America,” he wrote.

I spoke with President Biden this afternoon. Canadian Forces will now recover and analyze the wreckage of the object. Thank you to NORAD for keeping the watch over North America.

— Justin Trudeau (@JustinTrudeau) February 11, 2023

The Yukon is a sparsely populated region of Canada located north of British Columbia and adjacent to Alaska’s eastern border. It is still unclear what the object was or where it came from, but NORAD has confirmed that it did violate Canadian airspace and triggered an alert response. Trudeau also noted that he had spoken with President Joe Biden following the incident, indicating its significance.

The fact that an unidentified flying object could make its way into Canadian airspace without being noticed until it crossed international borders raises serious questions about the security of North America as a whole. If such objects can so easily penetrate our air defenses, what else might be able to get through? This event highlights just how important NORAD is in monitoring our skies and keeping us safe from potential threats.

Pentagon officials say the object shot down over Alaska Friday was about the "size of a small car" and not similar in size or shape to the Chinese surveillance balloon that was taken down off the coast of South Carolina last week. https://t.co/svdmjfEfqv pic.twitter.com/LScYKgNW1b

— CBS News (@CBSNews) February 10, 2023

While we still don’t know what the unidentified object was or where it originated from, it’s encouraging to know that there are systems in place like NORAD which can rapidly respond when needed and protect us all from harm. Thanks again to NORAD for keeping watch over North America!

On Tuesday, Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz of Florida announced an amendment to the House Rules package that passed Monday. This amendment would allow C-SPAN’s cameras to cover normal floor proceedings in the House of Representatives.

The proposal seeks to move away from the traditional fixed cameras seen on C-SPAN and enable four cameras operated by the cable network to be able to move around freely in the House of Representatives. The aim is to promote transparency and allow citizens a more direct view of how Congress operates. Let’s take a closer look at this proposed amendment.

What does it mean for transparency?

Gaetz believes that allowing more access to cameras will help strengthen accountability and oversight of Congress. It’s no secret that citizens are often frustrated with the lack of transparency in their government, so this could be an effective way to bridge that divide and help Americans better understand what goes on inside those walls.

The proposed amendment also takes into account logistical concerns, such as giving all members equal camera time and ensuring that each member has enough time to speak without interruption or distraction from other representatives. This allows every member, regardless of a political party or ideological alignment, an equal platform to voice their thoughts and perspectives on issues confronting America today.

What have been the reactions?

The reaction has been generally positive among Republicans and Democrats alike. Karen Finney, a spokeswoman for Hillary Clinton’s failed 2016 presidential campaign praised the amendment on CNN stating “I have to say, I never thought I would say this sentence. I agree with Matt Gaetz 100% on this one.” She added “transparency is key for our democracy” which highlights a broad consensus among both sides of the aisle about the importance of greater transparency in Congress. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has also commented positively on Gaetz’ proposed amendment saying he was open to considering it if it were brought up in his chamber as well.

TL;DR

The proposed C-SPAN Amendment seeks to bring greater transparency into how Congress operates by allowing more freedom for cameras within the House chambers itself rather than using fixed locations usually seen on television coverage of Congressional events.

It is rare these days for Republicans and Democrats alike to agree unanimously but this particular bill proves that when something is beneficial for all Americans regardless of party affiliation or political views it can still be accomplished in Washington D.C. We hope that if this bill passes it will lead us toward greater understanding between citizens and their representatives while promoting accountability within our government institutions.

featured image: Gage Skidmore

The Metropolitan Police Department recently released a surveillance camera image of the suspect in the alleged assault of Rep. Angie Craig (D-MN). After receiving tips from members of the public, police were able to make an arrest.

According to the U.S. Capitol Police, the suspect is believed to be a homeless man and is now facing charges of simple assault. Let’s take a look at how this story has unfolded.

The incident occurred on Thursday morning at around 7:15 a.m. when Craig said she saw the suspect in the lobby area of her apartment building “acting erratic” as if he was under the influence of drugs or alcohol. When she tried to pass him on an elevator, she says he began assaulting her and pushing her out of the way until someone else came along and intervened. No serious injuries were reported.

The Metropolitan Police Department then released a photo of the suspect taken by surveillance cameras in an effort to identify him for a simple assault offense and asked for help from members of the public. After receiving tips from multiple people, police arrested 26-year-old Kendrick Hamlin “AKA Hamlin Khalil Hamlin,” who did not have a fixed address, on Sunday night in connection with this incident. He is now facing charges for simple assault and is expected to appear in court today for his arraignment hearing.

This case serves as an example of how vital it can be for law enforcement officials to request help from members of their local community when trying to locate suspects or solve cases quickly and effectively. It also showcases how important it can be for citizens to cooperate with law enforcement agencies during times like these so that justice can truly be served across all divisions and demographics within society.

MPD seeks the public's assistance in identifying a suspect responsible for a Simple Assault that occurred this morning in the 300 block of H Street, NE, involving a member of Congress.

Have info? Call (202) 727-9099/text 50411 pic.twitter.com/ZDYbodVsw7

— DC Police Department (@DCPoliceDept) February 9, 2023

TL;DR:

It appears that justice has been served in this case after police made an arrest following their release of a photo taken by surveillance cameras at Rep Craig’s apartment building last week. With assistance from members of their local community, law enforcement officials were able to quickly identify and apprehend 26-year-old Kendrick Hamlin AKA Hamlin Khalil Hamlin who did not have a fixed address before charging him with simple assault relating to this incident.

This case serves as an example that when both citizens and law enforcement work together, justice can prevail regardless of division or demographic within society.

Recent reports have revealed what the feds have on Jeffery Epstein’s clients, and the details are shocking. Although no one has moved on this case yet, a former human trafficking prosecutor in Miami-Dade County has spoken about the federal investigation.

It is important to be aware of this information so that we can hold those responsible accountable for their actions.

Pedophilia and corruption have been dominating the news since Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s horrific crimes came to light. Epstein’s “little black book” – which contains the names of many powerful and influential figures – has become a major source of evidence of his associates’ involvement in his sex trafficking network. Despite the evidence, no indictments have been made against any of these people yet.

However, federal investigators had access to much more than just Epstein’s “little black book”. Jane Anderson, a former human trafficking prosecutor in Miami-Dade County, said that there was an extensive list of clients who were serviced by Epstein’s organization that was kept hidden from public view. Anderson says that investigators had access to documents including emails and financial records which could be used as evidence against those involved with Epstein’s network. Additionally, they had access to video footage taken from inside his home which showed many different people engaging in sexual activities with children and young adults.

#Thread Tucker Carlson's Monologue Demanding Answers About The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein And Calling Out AG Barr's "Investigation"

"3 & a half years after Jeffrey Epstein died, no one has gotten to the bottom of what happened that day & there has been no accountability for it." pic.twitter.com/ePOFWvbhAG

— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) January 26, 2023

Anderson also noted that although some investigations are ongoing, there hasn’t been much progress made due to a lack of resources or political interference from higher-ups within the government. This means that even though we may know who is involved in this case, it could still take years before anyone is held accountable for their actions.

Conclusion: It is clear that federal investigators have an abundance of evidence surrounding Jeffery Epstein’s clients but have not acted upon it yet due to a lack of resources or political interference. We must remain vigilant and demand justice for those affected by this tragic event so that all guilty parties can be held accountable for their heinous behavior.

With enough pressure from citizens around the world, we can help ensure justice is served swiftly and appropriately for victims of sex trafficking networks like Jeffery Epstein’s.

Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters recently found herself in a difficult situation when her own words were used against her during a House Rules Committee meeting.

Texas Rep. Chip Roy had read an op-ed from a Democrat from Cuba pointing out the similarities between democratic socialism and the system his family fled from, and Waters was unable to defend herself against it. Let’s dive deeper into this interesting exchange and what it reveals about socialism in America today.

“We can go around and around in circles about trying to talk about and defining socialism, but at its core I was intrigued by an op-ed that I saw not too long ago by a Democrat from Cuba commenting on one of our colleagues, an avowed socialist, and essentially pointing out the extent to which democratic socialism is a lot like the system my family fled except its proponents promised to be nicer when seizing your business. That’s the truth,” Texas Rep. Chip Roy said during the House Rules Committee meeting.

“I’ve got one question for… ranking member Waters in a 2008 hearing you said quote ‘and guess what, this liberal will be all about … this liberal will be all about socializing … would be about basically taking over the government and the government running all of your companies’ end quote,” Roy continued. “Simple question: Do you stand by that statement?”

“I’m not a socialist, I’m a capitalist and I commit to you that I am here to save Social Security, to save Medicare, to save seniors and Veterans and for some of you who have adopted certain kind of ways that you support what you now claim is socialism, I’m here to say to you, come on,” Waters said.

Roy then inquired as to why she was pushing so hard a decade ago about the government taking over the oil industry to which she could only say… “I am not a socialist.”

The Incident in Question

The incident occurred during a House Rules Committee meeting discussing H. Con. Res 9, which is a resolution made by Florida Congresswoman Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar denouncing socialism. Rep. Roy made the statement that democratic socialism is similar to the type of system his family had fled from, citing an op-ed as his source of information on the matter. When asked if she had anything to say against the comment, Waters simply replied “No I don’t have any comment on that” and quickly changed the topic to another pressing issue.

What Does This Say About Socialism?

This incident raises some interesting questions about the state of socialism in America today, particularly among Democrats who are often accused of practicing socialist policies without acknowledging them as such.

The fact that Waters was unable to respond when challenged on her beliefs demonstrates how difficult it can be for socialists to defend their beliefs under scrutiny, which could mean that there is more uncertainty about what socialism truly means than many people realize—and that there may not be unanimous agreement in America about how best to define it at all times.

featured image: Gage Skidmore

According to a recent survey from the Washington Post and ABC News, Donald Trump is leading Joe Biden by 3 percent in the polls as we approach Biden’s State of the Union address.

The survey polled 1,003 American adults from January 27 to February 1 and has a margin of error of 3.5 percent. Let’s take a closer look at why Trump continues to lead the polls and what this means for Biden.

The Reasons Behind Trump’s Lead

There are several factors that could be contributing to Trump’s lead over Biden in the polls. First and foremost, it could be due to his strong base of supporters who remain loyal despite any so-called controversies or missteps during his time in office. It also could be that many Americans are still feeling a sense of nostalgia for an era when they were more secure economically, with lower unemployment levels than before COVID-19 struck.

Furthermore, some may feel that Trump represents traditional values better than Biden does, making them more likely to vote for him if given the chance.

TL;DR

At this point, it is impossible to know how these numbers will change over time or even if they will stay consistent until THAT day arrives. What we do know is that Donald Trump currently holds a 3-point lead over Joe Biden on the eve of his latest State of the Union address as President–an address that could have significant implications for future polls depending on its content and reception from both sides of the aisle.

Time will tell if this lead holds or goes away as we get closer to election day but what seems certain is that President Donald J Trump continues to have an influence on politics across America today and will continue doing so until at least November 2024!