Category: Opinion

In a riveting exchange on Fox News, host Harris Faulkner put Democratic strategist Antjuan Seawright in the hot seat, probing into whether the Democratic Party might pivot from its race-centric campaign narratives to address the more pressing issue of inflation that’s hitting American voters hard. Since the inauguration of President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, the nation has been grappling with a staggering 20% hike in prices, peaking at an annual inflation rate of 9% in June 2022. This economic strain has even led some black voters to reconsider their allegiance, possibly turning towards Trump, drawn by economic rather than racial loyalty.

Faulkner didn’t hold back, challenging Seawright on the Democrats’ persistent focus on race. “It’s not the baseline that maybe Democrats think it is,” she asserted, suggesting that economic woes might be a stronger force in reclaiming voters leaning towards Trump for financial stability. Faulkner’s questioning was direct and probing, especially after showcasing women explaining to former CNN host Don Lemon their reluctance to support Harris.

Seawright attempted to defend the Democratic stance but was quickly confronted with Faulkner’s pointed inquiry: “Are things cheaper for you?” This question cuts to the heart of everyday Americans’ concerns, transcending racial lines and touching upon the universal pain of soaring prices.

Trump’s growing support among black voters is noteworthy, with a CBS poll indicating a rise to 17% and a Fox News poll suggesting an even more significant leap to 26%, up from the 12% support noted in the 2020 presidential election. These numbers hint at a shift in political allegiances driven by economic pressures rather than racial identity.

Despite Faulkner’s skepticism, Seawright highlighted the increasing number of eligible African-American voters, emphasizing their potential impact on future elections and defending Kamala Harris as a qualified candidate. Yet, Faulkner’s questioning remained sharp, challenging why Harris’s campaign seemed to lean heavily on racial identity instead of aligning with voters’ broader interests.

'Are Things Cheaper For You?': Faulkner Fires Back At Dem Who Says Black Voters Won't Vote For Trump Due To Economy pic.twitter.com/vM8ZfNWGx7

— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) August 21, 2024

The sentiments outside the Democratic National Convention in Chicago reflected this debate, with black voters openly crediting Trump for achievements largely ignored by mainstream media narratives. Seawright maintained that Harris had consistently addressed these issues throughout her career, asserting her qualifications beyond her racial and gender identity.

As this dialogue unfolds on national television, it encapsulates the broader conversation happening across America. The focus on race as a political strategy is being questioned in light of economic hardships that affect citizens regardless of color or ethnicity. This discussion not only highlights the evolving dynamics within the electorate but also underscores the need for political strategies that resonate with the immediate needs and concerns of all Americans.

We invite your thoughts and comments below on this pivotal issue facing our nation. How do you see race and economic concerns influencing voter decisions? Join the conversation and let us know your perspective.

Residents of Mexico, Maine, are feeling uneasy after the local police department shut down on Tuesday. This closure follows a troubling year and a half where the department faced a severe shortage of officers. Town leaders are hoping to eventually rebuild the police force, as reported by WGME. The immediate cause for this drastic decision was the resignation of three officers, leaving only three remaining on duty. James Theriault, the Mexico Police Administrator of Records, shared with WGME that those still working had been logging countless hours of overtime. “The citizens are concerned, and I don’t blame them,” he acknowledged, reflecting the community’s worries about safety.

Local residents have not held back their frustrations regarding the situation. Wayne McConnel, a resident of Mexico, voiced his discontent by stating, “I think it’s wrong.” The community is understandably anxious, especially since Theriault pointed out that both the town and county deal with a “high crime rate.” He has been tasked with the significant responsibility of rebuilding the police department within a year. In the meantime, law enforcement duties have shifted to the Oxford County Sheriff’s Office, which now bears the weight of maintaining order in the area.

Theriault is facing many challenges ahead but remains determined. “It is very difficult. I think we’ll be able to come out of this okay,” he said. His optimism showcases a commitment from local administration to navigate through this tough time despite numerous obstacles. Meanwhile, county officials have noted that the Oxford County Sheriff’s Office is nearly fully staffed after hiring three new deputies. Interestingly, two of these new hires are former police officers from Mexico. This brings a sense of familiarity to an otherwise challenging situation.

However, taking on policing duties for an expansive area of 2,000 square miles with just two dozen deputies is no small feat. The pressure on these officers to ensure safety and respond effectively to incidents is immense. With a population of 2,700 residents in Mexico itself, law enforcement will closely scrutinize every move made by community members eager for reassurance.

As reported by WGME, The Daily Caller has reached out to both the Oxford County Sheriff’s Office and the Town Office of Mexico for additional comments regarding this pressing issue; however, neither office has responded as of now. The ongoing transition period has left residents in a state of mixed emotions—apprehension about current safety and hope for future improvements as they await the rebuilding of their local police department.

While some may feel uncertain about what lies ahead, it’s clear that maintaining law and order in this interim period is crucial for community stability. The gravity of the situation cannot be overstated; residents deserve to feel safe in their own homes and neighborhoods. As they navigate these changes together, it’s essential for everyone involved to stay informed and engaged.

What do you think about the closure of the police department in Mexico? Share your thoughts in the comment section below!

In a recent exchange on ABC News, Republican Congressman Byron Donalds defended former President Donald Trump’s comments made at the National Association of Black Journalists Conference. Trump claimed he only became aware of Vice President Kamala Harris’s racial background a few years ago. During the interview, host George Stephanopoulos pressed Donalds about these controversial remarks, but Donalds argued that Harris’s racial identity has been “played up” over time. He stated, “This is really a phony controversy. I don’t really care, and most people don’t.”

Donalds pointed out that when Harris entered the United States Senate, the Associated Press labeled her as the first Indian American senator. He argued that this aspect of her identity was highlighted significantly during her initial campaign but has since shifted as she runs for national office. Stephanopoulos continued to challenge Donalds, questioning why he and Trump have raised issues regarding Harris’s background, emphasizing that she has always identified as biracial with an Indian mother and Jamaican father.

In response, Donalds noted that discussions about identity are prevalent on social media, suggesting that it is a topic many people are trying to understand. However, he insisted that this should not overshadow more pressing issues facing the nation. The back-and-forth between the two escalated when Stephanopoulos interrupted Donalds, accusing him of repeatedly questioning Harris’s racial identity.

The tension escalated further as Donalds reiterated his point about the Associated Press’s previous coverage of Harris’s background. He insisted that he was not the one bringing it up repeatedly; rather, it was Stephanopoulos who kept returning to the topic. In a firm tone, Stephanopoulos rebutted by stating that Donalds had mentioned it multiple times in their discussion and accused him of perpetuating a slur against Harris.

Despite Stephanopoulos’s insistence that Trump and Donalds were misrepresenting facts about Harris’s racial identity, Donalds maintained his position. He emphasized that discussions around race should not distract from critical national issues like leadership and policy-making. He criticized Harris for her handling of various challenges, particularly at the border, arguing that she has failed to provide effective solutions.

Donalds expressed a desire to focus on future challenges facing America rather than getting caught up in debates over racial identity. He stated, “The American people do need serious policy decisions to be made,” highlighting what he sees as a lack of effective leadership from Harris compared to Trump’s past performance.

While some may interpret Trump’s statement as offensive or divisive, there are arguments suggesting it was merely an observation about Harris’s background. Donalds echoed this sentiment by pointing out how her identity has been portrayed differently throughout her political career. Critics of their remarks often accuse them of targeting Harris’s racial identity unfairly; however, supporters argue they are simply discussing factual representations.

Harris’s tenure as vice president has faced scrutiny for perceived shortcomings in leadership and effectiveness, especially regarding immigration issues at the southern border. Many believe she has not taken significant action or provided adequate solutions to address these ongoing problems, which affects both American citizens and immigrants alike.

What do you think about this exchange? Share your thoughts in the comment section below!

During a recent episode of NBC’s “Andrea Mitchell Reports,” host Chuck Todd suggested that Vice President Kamala Harris’ decision to select Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as her running mate might have been swayed by pressure from the progressive left. Todd pointed out that Harris had initially considered other candidates for the vice presidential position, including Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro and Arizona Senator Mark Kelly. However, he speculated that the backlash from progressives against these more centrist figures could have influenced her final choice of Walz.

Todd expressed his thoughts by saying, “I have a yellow flag in my head going, ‘Huh, if you squeal loud enough, she hears and responds.’” He noted that some people might conclude that the progressive pushback was instrumental in steering Harris away from Shapiro and Kelly. While he acknowledged the possibility that those candidates may not have been thoroughly vetted, he couldn’t shake the feeling that the progressive reaction played a significant role in her decision-making process.

Support for Walz among progressive activists surged once it became known that he was a leading contender for the vice presidential slot. His policies, which include support for transgender surgeries for minors and efforts to create a carbon-free electrical grid, resonated with many on the left. This alignment with progressive values likely contributed to the enthusiasm surrounding his candidacy among certain activist groups.

Former White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany weighed in on Harris’ selection, suggesting that there might be “a lot of cheering at Mar-a-Lago” as former President Donald Trump looks to challenge the Harris-Walz ticket. McEnany highlighted Walz’s liberal track record, which includes backing driver’s licenses for undocumented immigrants and supporting abortion rights. She described him as “a progressive in sheep’s clothing,” arguing that his policies are far more left-leaning than what most Americans would prefer.

McEnany further elaborated on the implications of this choice for Harris. She stated, “Kamala Harris now has to do the exact opposite of what Tim Walz did. While he became more progressive, she is trying to become more moderate.” This tension between their political positions could create challenges for Harris as she navigates her campaign strategy. Republicans are expected to point out this contradiction, questioning how Harris can claim to distance herself from progressive policies while selecting someone like Walz.

CNN commentator Van Jones also voiced concerns regarding conservative reactions to Harris’ pick. He remarked, “What worries me is you see a lot of relief from the conservatives. They were scared of Josh Shapiro… they were scared of Mark Kelly.” According to Jones, conservatives believe that those candidates would help define Harris as more centrist. The fact that they appear pleased with Walz’s nomination could signal trouble for her campaign.

As discussions unfold about Harris’ choice of Walz as her running mate, it seems clear that this decision may have been made with an eye toward appeasing both progressives and moderates within the Democratic Party. However, how this choice will play out politically remains uncertain. The reactions from both sides of the aisle will likely shape public perception and influence future campaigning strategies.

'Yellow Flag': Chuck Todd Says He 'Can't Help But' Think 'Progressive Backlash' Led Harris To Pick Tim Walz pic.twitter.com/5hiVssgbTN

— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) August 6, 2024

What do you think about Kamala Harris choosing Tim Walz as her running mate? Share your thoughts in the comments section below!

We all know that the American elections are influenced by dark money elites. However, the recent revelation of Swiss billionaire Hansjörg Wyss’s involvement in propping up the Democrats’ agenda has been particularly concerning.

Wyss, who has made a fortune in the medical device industry, has funneled a whopping $72 million to the Berger Action Fund, according to a discovery report by The Washington Free Beacon. The money is then given to nonprofits that don’t have to disclose their sources or expenditures. This means that Wyss can easily bypass any bans on foreign political involvement, as he is a foreign national.

Tax records and statements from the group reveal that $62.7 million of the $72.7 million donated by Wyss’ Berger Action Fund was directed towards organizations that were focused on building support for the Biden agenda.

Further, the Sixteen Thirty Fund and the New Venture Fund – two organizations that share the same founder, address and management firm – collectively received $245 million in donations from Wyss’s groups since 2016.

This whole situation has been met with alarm by Caitlin Sutherland, the Executive Director of Americans for Public Trust. Sutherland has called for “immediate scrutiny” of Wyss’s giving, saying that “tens of millions have been spent promoting President Biden’s radical agenda and propping up liberal candidates.”

This is an incredibly worrying situation. It is clear that foreign national Wyss is using his money to influence American politics and policy. It is also a worrying reminder of just how much power dark money elites have in our elections and rights.

It is essential that we continue to be vigilant and to recognize the influence of dark money elites. We must also ensure that our elections remain free and fair and that our rights are not being compromised by the influence of these wealthy elites.

A Florida state senator filed a bill that would allow selected convicted criminals to enlist in the military in lieu of serving jail or prison time.

Florida Senator Darryl Rouson filed Senate Bill 1356, which would allow defendants who are 25 years old or younger to apply for enlistment in the military instead of jail time. Potential applicants must not be habitual offenders or be facing longer than 4 years in incarceration to qualify to choose military service.

The bill will not allow defendants to choose military service if the primary offense committed doesn’t require a mandatory minimum prison sentence.

Applicants for military service must earn a “minimum acceptable score” on the ASVAB test and complete both basic training and their first term of enlistment. All fines relating to the charges will be required to be paid by the end of the first term of enlistment.

Florida Representative Patricia Williams also filed a similar bill in September, according to. Florida’s 2022 legislative session will begin on Jan. 11.

At the National Rifle Association Convention on Friday, former Vice President Mike Pence was met with a chorus of boos when he stepped up to the podium. Undeterred, he managed to quip “I love you too,” before continuing.

In January 2021, footage from a documentary showed Pence reacting to Nancy Pelosi’s House resolution demanding he invokes the 25th Amendment and removes Donald Trump from office following the events of January 6. Smirking, he responded with a curt “Yeah, excellent” before ordering an aide to print him off a hard copy. He added in his own defense that “I’m always hopeful about America.”

Fox News host Tucker Carlson has been vocal in his criticism of Pence, stating that “He spent four years getting bossed around by Donald Trump like a concubine.” Carlson added that he believed Pence to be “delusional”, and that anyone encouraging him to run for president should be fired. He concluded with an appeal for Pence to take a break and reflect on himself and the world.

Regardless of what happens next, it is clear that Pence’s actions have not been forgotten. Only time will tell if the former Vice President can recover from this rocky start as he looks ahead to potential presidential prospects in 2024.

HAHAHAHAHAHA

Mike Pence getting booed at the NRA Convention today. pic.twitter.com/6h32e0b2dt

— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) April 14, 2023

Pence’s “Yeah, excellent,” was followed by a smirk, and “Um, tell Zack to print me off a hard copy for the trip home. Great.”

“I’m always hopeful about America,” Pence added.

“He spent four years getting bossed around by Donald Trump like a concubine,” Fox News’ Tucker Carlson said of Pence last year. “He was bossed around by his donors when he was governor of Indiana. He’s not in a position to lead anything.”

Carlson added, “The idea that he’s going to run for president is, like, delusional, and is clearly only benefiting his consultants. He should fire anyone who is telling him to go to New Hampshire and run for president and give dumb speeches about the FBI when he has no idea what he’s talking about.”

“It’s super embarrassing. I don’t want to beat up on Mike Pence,” Carlson insisted, but “if you’re that detached from reality you need to take a break and think deeply about yourself and the world.”

The Biden administration failed to appeal a ruling from Jeffrey Barrows, DO, MA (Ethics) – an OBGYN – that stated no one should be forced to violate their conscience or religious beliefs when it comes to providing healthcare.

ADF Legal Counsel Jacob Reed also noted that employers in the Christian Employers Alliance have the constitutional right to conduct their business in line with their religious beliefs. The lawsuit filed by ADF and explained a misinterpretation of discrimination based sex in Title VII, sought to protect religious employers from being forced to provide health insurance coverage for gender transition procedures or surgeries.

Additionally, the mandate required healthcare providers to both speak positively about these procedures despite disagreeing with them and barred them from sharing their medical opinions or objections. If the CEA members did not comply, they faced loss of federal funds, expensive litigation, fines criminal penalties, and attorneys’ fees and costs.

Senior counsel Matt Bowman argued that all doctors and nurses should have the protection to “live and work in a manner consistent with their faith”. He urged the Biden administration to withdraw this harmful proposal, stressing that it is an “illegal and gross overreach of executive power”. With the failure to appeal the ruling, the mandate is now blocked by the appellate court.

“Doctors, nurses, and other medical providers should enjoy this same constitutional protection, free to live and work in a manner consistent with their faith,” Alliance Defending Freedom senior counsel Matt Bowman said in a statement. “Yet the Biden administration’s proposed rule would abandon health care professionals to being forced to perform medical procedures that directly violate their religious beliefs or risk losing their jobs.”

“This is an illegal and gross overreach of executive power, and we urge the administration to withdraw this harmful proposal immediately,” Bowman said.

The Biden administration had until November 25th to appeal the ruling and failed to do so — meaning the mandate is now blocked by the appellate court.

It’s often said that politics stops at the water’s edge, but Joe Biden clearly missed the memo. During a trip to Ireland this week, he showed an unbelievable lack of respect for America – even more than golfer Phil Mickelson when he accepted money from Saudi Arabia. “I’d rather have my children playing rugby now,” Sleepy Joe remarked, “for health reasons than I would have them playing football.”

The ill-considered comment has caused outrage here: bald eagles are crashing from the sky, drunken Little League dads are punching their fists in fury, and if Tom Brady wasn’t paralyzed by his plastic surgery I’m sure he’d be shedding tears too.

Joe Biden must go. His botched Afghanistan withdrawal, Hunter’s Chinese business deals, and open borders have taken a backseat to this. Let me take the opportunity to educate the president – football was first played in America in 1869 between Rutgers and Princeton, and we made it better than the middling European version of the sport that preceded it.

Congress must act: Article Two of the Constitution states that “The President… shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

If bashing our national sport in a country with no Super Bowls or SEC championships isn’t treasonous then I don’t know what is. Where are the Republican Demands Answers letters? Where is the indignation? It’s time for Congress to impeach and remove Joe Biden.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYZyAA9cHXk&pp=ygUWam9lIGJpZGVuIGlzIHRoZSB3b3JzdA%3D%3D

In response to the FBI raid at former President Trump’s home in Mar-a-Lago, a federal judge has granted his request for a Special Master review of the material seized and temporarily enjoined or forbidden the Biden Administration from using any confiscated materials.

It was revealed that it was Joe Biden who ordered the FBI access to these documents. The White House had previously stated that neither the President nor their office was briefed on this matter, however, this is contrary to what Judge Aileen Cannon found in her ruling.

The Gateway Pundit reported on this story and shared pages 2-3 of the ruling which showcased Joe Biden’s order for FBI access to Mar-a-Lago documents and personal belongings. Contrary to what Mr. Biden and the White House had previously stated, they are now caught in a lie. Conservative Treehouse also discussed this matter further.

It is yet to be seen what will come from this review and how it will impact the Biden Administration moving forward.

AP's @ZekeJMiller: "The FBI…served a search warrant on the [Trump']s residence…Was [he] or anyone at the WH aware of that…or has [he] been briefed in the aftermath of that…being executed?"

KJP: "No. The President was not briefed…No one at the WH was given a heads up." pic.twitter.com/jbk4jwRQhX

— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) August 9, 2022

———————————

It is expected that President Trump’s lawyers will now be able to review exactly what the FBI confiscated during the raid, including 16-year-old Barron Trump’s room and First Lady Melania Trump’s closet. The outcome of this review may have serious implications for the Biden Administration. It remains to be seen how this story will progress in the coming days.

However, it has already been established that Joe Biden was responsible for ordering access to these documents, contrary to previous statements from himself and his team. As of now, the review process is underway and it is uncertain what more revelations may come from this. Only time will tell.

**The outcome of this review may have serious implications for the Biden Administration. It remains to be seen how this story will progress in the coming days, but it has already been established that Joe Biden was responsible for ordering access to these documents which contradicts previous statements from himself and his team. The Special Master review process is currently ongoing, so only time will tell what further revelations may arise from this matter.**