Author: avadmin

  • Byron Donalds Takes on ABC Host in Explosive Debate About Kamala’s Race

    Byron Donalds Takes on ABC Host in Explosive Debate About Kamala’s Race

    In a recent exchange on ABC News, Republican Congressman Byron Donalds defended former President Donald Trump’s comments made at the National Association of Black Journalists Conference. Trump claimed he only became aware of Vice President Kamala Harris’s racial background a few years ago. During the interview, host George Stephanopoulos pressed Donalds about these controversial remarks, but Donalds argued that Harris’s racial identity has been “played up” over time. He stated, “This is really a phony controversy. I don’t really care, and most people don’t.”

    Donalds pointed out that when Harris entered the United States Senate, the Associated Press labeled her as the first Indian American senator. He argued that this aspect of her identity was highlighted significantly during her initial campaign but has since shifted as she runs for national office. Stephanopoulos continued to challenge Donalds, questioning why he and Trump have raised issues regarding Harris’s background, emphasizing that she has always identified as biracial with an Indian mother and Jamaican father.

    In response, Donalds noted that discussions about identity are prevalent on social media, suggesting that it is a topic many people are trying to understand. However, he insisted that this should not overshadow more pressing issues facing the nation. The back-and-forth between the two escalated when Stephanopoulos interrupted Donalds, accusing him of repeatedly questioning Harris’s racial identity.

    The tension escalated further as Donalds reiterated his point about the Associated Press’s previous coverage of Harris’s background. He insisted that he was not the one bringing it up repeatedly; rather, it was Stephanopoulos who kept returning to the topic. In a firm tone, Stephanopoulos rebutted by stating that Donalds had mentioned it multiple times in their discussion and accused him of perpetuating a slur against Harris.

    Despite Stephanopoulos’s insistence that Trump and Donalds were misrepresenting facts about Harris’s racial identity, Donalds maintained his position. He emphasized that discussions around race should not distract from critical national issues like leadership and policy-making. He criticized Harris for her handling of various challenges, particularly at the border, arguing that she has failed to provide effective solutions.

    Donalds expressed a desire to focus on future challenges facing America rather than getting caught up in debates over racial identity. He stated, “The American people do need serious policy decisions to be made,” highlighting what he sees as a lack of effective leadership from Harris compared to Trump’s past performance.

    While some may interpret Trump’s statement as offensive or divisive, there are arguments suggesting it was merely an observation about Harris’s background. Donalds echoed this sentiment by pointing out how her identity has been portrayed differently throughout her political career. Critics of their remarks often accuse them of targeting Harris’s racial identity unfairly; however, supporters argue they are simply discussing factual representations.

    Harris’s tenure as vice president has faced scrutiny for perceived shortcomings in leadership and effectiveness, especially regarding immigration issues at the southern border. Many believe she has not taken significant action or provided adequate solutions to address these ongoing problems, which affects both American citizens and immigrants alike.

    What do you think about this exchange? Share your thoughts in the comment section below!

  • Chuck Todd Uncovers Surprising Insights into Harris’ Selection as Vice President

    Chuck Todd Uncovers Surprising Insights into Harris’ Selection as Vice President

    During a recent episode of NBC’s “Andrea Mitchell Reports,” host Chuck Todd suggested that Vice President Kamala Harris’ decision to select Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as her running mate might have been swayed by pressure from the progressive left. Todd pointed out that Harris had initially considered other candidates for the vice presidential position, including Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro and Arizona Senator Mark Kelly. However, he speculated that the backlash from progressives against these more centrist figures could have influenced her final choice of Walz.

    Todd expressed his thoughts by saying, “I have a yellow flag in my head going, ‘Huh, if you squeal loud enough, she hears and responds.’” He noted that some people might conclude that the progressive pushback was instrumental in steering Harris away from Shapiro and Kelly. While he acknowledged the possibility that those candidates may not have been thoroughly vetted, he couldn’t shake the feeling that the progressive reaction played a significant role in her decision-making process.

    Support for Walz among progressive activists surged once it became known that he was a leading contender for the vice presidential slot. His policies, which include support for transgender surgeries for minors and efforts to create a carbon-free electrical grid, resonated with many on the left. This alignment with progressive values likely contributed to the enthusiasm surrounding his candidacy among certain activist groups.

    Former White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany weighed in on Harris’ selection, suggesting that there might be “a lot of cheering at Mar-a-Lago” as former President Donald Trump looks to challenge the Harris-Walz ticket. McEnany highlighted Walz’s liberal track record, which includes backing driver’s licenses for undocumented immigrants and supporting abortion rights. She described him as “a progressive in sheep’s clothing,” arguing that his policies are far more left-leaning than what most Americans would prefer.

    McEnany further elaborated on the implications of this choice for Harris. She stated, “Kamala Harris now has to do the exact opposite of what Tim Walz did. While he became more progressive, she is trying to become more moderate.” This tension between their political positions could create challenges for Harris as she navigates her campaign strategy. Republicans are expected to point out this contradiction, questioning how Harris can claim to distance herself from progressive policies while selecting someone like Walz.

    CNN commentator Van Jones also voiced concerns regarding conservative reactions to Harris’ pick. He remarked, “What worries me is you see a lot of relief from the conservatives. They were scared of Josh Shapiro… they were scared of Mark Kelly.” According to Jones, conservatives believe that those candidates would help define Harris as more centrist. The fact that they appear pleased with Walz’s nomination could signal trouble for her campaign.

    As discussions unfold about Harris’ choice of Walz as her running mate, it seems clear that this decision may have been made with an eye toward appeasing both progressives and moderates within the Democratic Party. However, how this choice will play out politically remains uncertain. The reactions from both sides of the aisle will likely shape public perception and influence future campaigning strategies.

    What do you think about Kamala Harris choosing Tim Walz as her running mate? Share your thoughts in the comments section below!

  • OMG! More Dark Money Found In Joe Biden’s Bank Account

    OMG! More Dark Money Found In Joe Biden’s Bank Account

    We all know that the American elections are influenced by dark money elites. However, the recent revelation of Swiss billionaire Hansjörg Wyss’s involvement in propping up the Democrats’ agenda has been particularly concerning.

    Wyss, who has made a fortune in the medical device industry, has funneled a whopping $72 million to the Berger Action Fund, according to a discovery report by The Washington Free Beacon. The money is then given to nonprofits that don’t have to disclose their sources or expenditures. This means that Wyss can easily bypass any bans on foreign political involvement, as he is a foreign national.

    Tax records and statements from the group reveal that $62.7 million of the $72.7 million donated by Wyss’ Berger Action Fund was directed towards organizations that were focused on building support for the Biden agenda.

    Further, the Sixteen Thirty Fund and the New Venture Fund – two organizations that share the same founder, address and management firm – collectively received $245 million in donations from Wyss’s groups since 2016.

    This whole situation has been met with alarm by Caitlin Sutherland, the Executive Director of Americans for Public Trust. Sutherland has called for “immediate scrutiny” of Wyss’s giving, saying that “tens of millions have been spent promoting President Biden’s radical agenda and propping up liberal candidates.”

    This is an incredibly worrying situation. It is clear that foreign national Wyss is using his money to influence American politics and policy. It is also a worrying reminder of just how much power dark money elites have in our elections and rights.

    It is essential that we continue to be vigilant and to recognize the influence of dark money elites. We must also ensure that our elections remain free and fair and that our rights are not being compromised by the influence of these wealthy elites.

  • VIDEO: Mike Pence Gets BOOED OFF STAGE At Major Convention!

    VIDEO: Mike Pence Gets BOOED OFF STAGE At Major Convention!

    At the National Rifle Association Convention on Friday, former Vice President Mike Pence was met with a chorus of boos when he stepped up to the podium. Undeterred, he managed to quip “I love you too,” before continuing.

    In January 2021, footage from a documentary showed Pence reacting to Nancy Pelosi’s House resolution demanding he invokes the 25th Amendment and removes Donald Trump from office following the events of January 6. Smirking, he responded with a curt “Yeah, excellent” before ordering an aide to print him off a hard copy. He added in his own defense that “I’m always hopeful about America.”

    Fox News host Tucker Carlson has been vocal in his criticism of Pence, stating that “He spent four years getting bossed around by Donald Trump like a concubine.” Carlson added that he believed Pence to be “delusional”, and that anyone encouraging him to run for president should be fired. He concluded with an appeal for Pence to take a break and reflect on himself and the world.

    Regardless of what happens next, it is clear that Pence’s actions have not been forgotten. Only time will tell if the former Vice President can recover from this rocky start as he looks ahead to potential presidential prospects in 2024.

    Pence’s “Yeah, excellent,” was followed by a smirk, and “Um, tell Zack to print me off a hard copy for the trip home. Great.”

    “I’m always hopeful about America,” Pence added.

    “He spent four years getting bossed around by Donald Trump like a concubine,” Fox News’ Tucker Carlson said of Pence last year. “He was bossed around by his donors when he was governor of Indiana. He’s not in a position to lead anything.”

    Carlson added, “The idea that he’s going to run for president is, like, delusional, and is clearly only benefiting his consultants. He should fire anyone who is telling him to go to New Hampshire and run for president and give dumb speeches about the FBI when he has no idea what he’s talking about.”

    “It’s super embarrassing. I don’t want to beat up on Mike Pence,” Carlson insisted, but “if you’re that detached from reality you need to take a break and think deeply about yourself and the world.”

  • Federal Judge Hands Down HUGE Win For Conservatives, Shoots Down Biden’s Audacious Mandate

    Federal Judge Hands Down HUGE Win For Conservatives, Shoots Down Biden’s Audacious Mandate

    The Biden administration failed to appeal a ruling from Jeffrey Barrows, DO, MA (Ethics) – an OBGYN – that stated no one should be forced to violate their conscience or religious beliefs when it comes to providing healthcare.

    ADF Legal Counsel Jacob Reed also noted that employers in the Christian Employers Alliance have the constitutional right to conduct their business in line with their religious beliefs. The lawsuit filed by ADF and explained a misinterpretation of discrimination based sex in Title VII, sought to protect religious employers from being forced to provide health insurance coverage for gender transition procedures or surgeries.

    Additionally, the mandate required healthcare providers to both speak positively about these procedures despite disagreeing with them and barred them from sharing their medical opinions or objections. If the CEA members did not comply, they faced loss of federal funds, expensive litigation, fines criminal penalties, and attorneys’ fees and costs.

    Senior counsel Matt Bowman argued that all doctors and nurses should have the protection to “live and work in a manner consistent with their faith”. He urged the Biden administration to withdraw this harmful proposal, stressing that it is an “illegal and gross overreach of executive power”. With the failure to appeal the ruling, the mandate is now blocked by the appellate court.

    “Doctors, nurses, and other medical providers should enjoy this same constitutional protection, free to live and work in a manner consistent with their faith,” Alliance Defending Freedom senior counsel Matt Bowman said in a statement. “Yet the Biden administration’s proposed rule would abandon health care professionals to being forced to perform medical procedures that directly violate their religious beliefs or risk losing their jobs.”

    “This is an illegal and gross overreach of executive power, and we urge the administration to withdraw this harmful proposal immediately,” Bowman said.

    The Biden administration had until November 25th to appeal the ruling and failed to do so — meaning the mandate is now blocked by the appellate court.

  • Joe Biden Just Committed His Most Impeachable Offense Yet

    Joe Biden Just Committed His Most Impeachable Offense Yet

    It’s often said that politics stops at the water’s edge, but Joe Biden clearly missed the memo. During a trip to Ireland this week, he showed an unbelievable lack of respect for America – even more than golfer Phil Mickelson when he accepted money from Saudi Arabia. “I’d rather have my children playing rugby now,” Sleepy Joe remarked, “for health reasons than I would have them playing football.”

    The ill-considered comment has caused outrage here: bald eagles are crashing from the sky, drunken Little League dads are punching their fists in fury, and if Tom Brady wasn’t paralyzed by his plastic surgery I’m sure he’d be shedding tears too.

    Joe Biden must go. His botched Afghanistan withdrawal, Hunter’s Chinese business deals, and open borders have taken a backseat to this. Let me take the opportunity to educate the president – football was first played in America in 1869 between Rutgers and Princeton, and we made it better than the middling European version of the sport that preceded it.

    Congress must act: Article Two of the Constitution states that “The President… shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

    If bashing our national sport in a country with no Super Bowls or SEC championships isn’t treasonous then I don’t know what is. Where are the Republican Demands Answers letters? Where is the indignation? It’s time for Congress to impeach and remove Joe Biden.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYZyAA9cHXk&pp=ygUWam9lIGJpZGVuIGlzIHRoZSB3b3JzdA%3D%3D

  • ALERT: HE’S GUILTY! Federal Judge EXPOSES BIDEN

    ALERT: HE’S GUILTY! Federal Judge EXPOSES BIDEN

    In response to the FBI raid at former President Trump’s home in Mar-a-Lago, a federal judge has granted his request for a Special Master review of the material seized and temporarily enjoined or forbidden the Biden Administration from using any confiscated materials.

    It was revealed that it was Joe Biden who ordered the FBI access to these documents. The White House had previously stated that neither the President nor their office was briefed on this matter, however, this is contrary to what Judge Aileen Cannon found in her ruling.

    The Gateway Pundit reported on this story and shared pages 2-3 of the ruling which showcased Joe Biden’s order for FBI access to Mar-a-Lago documents and personal belongings. Contrary to what Mr. Biden and the White House had previously stated, they are now caught in a lie. Conservative Treehouse also discussed this matter further.

    It is yet to be seen what will come from this review and how it will impact the Biden Administration moving forward.

    ———————————

    It is expected that President Trump’s lawyers will now be able to review exactly what the FBI confiscated during the raid, including 16-year-old Barron Trump’s room and First Lady Melania Trump’s closet. The outcome of this review may have serious implications for the Biden Administration. It remains to be seen how this story will progress in the coming days.

    However, it has already been established that Joe Biden was responsible for ordering access to these documents, contrary to previous statements from himself and his team. As of now, the review process is underway and it is uncertain what more revelations may come from this. Only time will tell.

    **The outcome of this review may have serious implications for the Biden Administration. It remains to be seen how this story will progress in the coming days, but it has already been established that Joe Biden was responsible for ordering access to these documents which contradicts previous statements from himself and his team. The Special Master review process is currently ongoing, so only time will tell what further revelations may arise from this matter.**

  • RINO Goes On MSNBC And Calls Republicans ‘White Nationalists’

    RINO Goes On MSNBC And Calls Republicans ‘White Nationalists’

    On Friday, MSNBC’s The 11th hosted Mehdi Hasan and David Jolly, claiming that Republicans are returning to white nationalism with their education policies. However, the facts tell a different story.

    The books that have been banned or challenged were due to explicit sexual content, not any political agenda. The controversy surrounding Michelangelo’s statue of David was because parents were uninformed about the nude art lesson and not for any other reason related to politics.

    In reality, Republicans are only trying to maintain commonsense education policies which will help kids learn practical skills and knowledge which will support them later in life; rather than being taught woke ideology that is unnecessary and irrelevant in classrooms. They also want parents to have a say in their children’s educational decisions and to hold school districts accountable.

    These policies have nothing to do with white nationalism or discrimination. It is simply about making sure our kids get the best education possible and that parents can have a voice in their children’s education. We should all support them in this venture. The Left has been attempting to frame the GOP as out-of-date, but in actuality, they are trying to ensure our kids get a good education. We should pay attention to the facts.

    Watch: MRC TV video player

    This is not about going back to a regressive past, but rather making sure our children get the best possible education and that parents can be involved in their decisions. We should all be on board with this. Let’s pay attention to the facts and support good educational policies. It is in the best interest of our kids’ future success. That’s what matters most.

  • The View Is Fuming After Trump Suckers Them

    The View Is Fuming After Trump Suckers Them

    The media’s biases against President Donald Trump are on full display once again. This time, it’s over the Manhattan District Attorney’s unsubstantiated claims that he could be charged with violating campaign finance laws.

    The View on ABC wasted no time in jumping on the bandwagon, with Whoopi Goldberg sarcastically pointing out that “you said they are going to arrest you. They didn’t arrest you.”

    It seems like every week there is another outlandish claim from the liberal media about President Trump that turns out to be false or lacking evidence.

    In this case, it was the prediction of his arrest which never came to fruition. Unfortunately, this has become commonplace among news outlets such as The View which have an obvious bias against Trump and eagerly jump at any opportunity to criticize him even when there is little or no evidence to back up their claims.

    This is indicative of a larger problem in our society where facts and truth take a backseat to sensationalism and emotion-driven narratives. Such behavior only serves to further divide us along ideological lines and create an environment of fear and mistrust instead of one based on facts and reason.

    Unfortunately, this kind of biased reporting does have real-world consequences for those involved, as it can lead people to draw unwarranted conclusions about individuals without having all the information needed to make an informed decision. It also encourages people not to seek out alternative sources of news so they can get a more balanced view of events before forming opinions or taking action on them.

    This kind of guessing is dangerous and foolish because it adds to the media’s story that Trump is guilty of something. The media should be more careful about what they say and not jump to conclusions without solid proof. If they don’t, they just add to the false idea that Trump is a criminal and should be jailed.

  • Pentagon: Yes Biden is Hiding Classified Docs

    Pentagon: Yes Biden is Hiding Classified Docs

    The recent allegations made by the Pentagon Inspector General are extremely concerning and require immediate attention from our nation’s leaders.

    If true, these reports would mean that Joe Biden has betrayed our troops in Afghanistan and hidden deals with the Taliban that run counter to US interests. This revelation is particularly alarming given the chaos in Afghanistan since the withdrawal of US forces, including a takeover of power by the Taliban.

    The implications of this report are far-reaching and have sparked outrage among lawmakers on both sides of the aisle. Republican Senator Tom Cotton has called for an investigation into the matter, stating that “if true, these allegations would be a shocking betrayal of our troops and our country.” We must ensure that those responsible for making such decisions face consequences if they have acted against American interests.

    The White House has denied these claims, but many people remain skeptical given recent events in Afghanistan. It is essential that any side deals between Biden and the Taliban be revealed in order to protect our troops and prevent any similar actions occurring in future conflicts. The American public deserves transparency regarding what agreements have been made between their government and foreign entities like the Taliban.

    It is also important to note that Biden’s approach to withdrawing from Afghanistan was misguided from its outset – he did not receive approval from Congress or military leaders before pulling out US forces under a timeline set by his predecessor. This decision has had disastrous consequences for Afghan civilians as well as US troops who now face increased risks due to instability caused by a weakened government and emboldened terrorists groups like al Qaeda and ISIS-Khorasan Province (ISKP).

    Our nation must take steps to investigate these allegations immediately so we can hold those responsible accountable for their actions if necessary. We owe it to our brave men and women in uniform who served honorably in Afghanistan – they deserve better than having their commander-in-chief make secret deals behind closed doors with their enemy. The American people deserve nothing less than complete transparency when it comes to decisions made by their elected officials – anything less undermines trust in our democracy itself.