Author: J.P. Knowles

  • Dying Man Confesses To 50-Year-Old Crime Leaving Behind A Bigger Mystery

    Dying Man Confesses To 50-Year-Old Crime Leaving Behind A Bigger Mystery

    Shortly before Thomas Randele died, his wife of nearly 40 years asked his golfing buddies and his co-workers from the dealerships where he sold cars to come by their home.

    The group came to say goodbye to a friend they described as one of the nicest people they’d ever known — a devoted family man who bragged about his daughter, a golfer who played by the rules, cared for by so many that a line stretched outside the funeral home just one week later.

    At the time of their visit last May at Randele’s house in suburban Boston, cancer in his lungs had taken away his voice. So the friends left without knowing that their friend they’d spent countless hours with had never told them his biggest secret.

    For the past 50 years, Randele was a fugitive wanted in one of the biggest bank robberies in Cleveland’s history, living in Boston under an assumed name he’d created six months after the heist in the summer of 1969. Not even his wife or daughter knew about his past until he told them in what authorities described as a deathbed confession.

    The mystery of how he was able to leave behind one family and create a new life, all while evading a father and son from the U.S. Marshals Service who never gave up their hunt, is just now being pieced together.

    Ted Conrad learned that the security at the Society National Bank in Cleveland was pretty lax after he started working there as a teller in January 1969.

    Conrad told his friends that it would be easy to rob the bank, said Russell Metcalf, his best friend from high school.

    One day after his 20th birthday that July, Conrad walked out of the vault with $215,000 from the vault, a haul worth $1.6 million today. By the time the money was found missing, Conrad was already flying across the country.

    In a letter sent to his girlfriend, Conrad said that he thought he could return when the statute of limitations expired. But once he was indicted, that was no longer true.

    Conrad completely cut off all contact with his family. Some eventually presumed he was dead, said Matt Boettger, whose mother was Conrad’s older sister.

    His mom, he said, was relieved to find out that her brother had lived a happy life. “She thought she would go to her grave and never know,” he said.

    At the time of the bank heist in 1969, the country was focused on Apollo 11’s historic flight to the moon, so the robbery didn’t capture the attention of the nation, or even of Cleveland.

    But for John Elliott, a deputy U.S. Marshal, it was personal because he and Conrad came from the same side of town.

    Conrad had a head start and was disciplined enough not to make mistakes so he was difficult to find.

    Elliott traveled across the U.S. looking for Conrad and even after retiring would check on the case, according to his son, Pete Elliott, now the top U.S. marshal in Cleveland, who took up the hunt for Conrad nearly 20 years ago.

    Elliot’s father died in March 2020 before investigators pieced together details from Randele’s obituary and signatures from his past. Then in November, Randle’s family confirmed that just before he died, he told them what he had done, Elliott said.

    Conrad’s motive for committing the robbery has been analyzed endlessly.

    “It wasn’t about the money. He always wanted to impress people,” said Metcalf, his high school friend.

    Investigators believe he was inspired by the 1968 movie “The Thomas Crown Affair,” about a bank executive who got away with $2.6 million and turned the heist into a game.

    After the real-life robbery in Cleveland, Conrad wound up in the Boston area, where much of the movie was filmed.

    Thomas Randele came into existence in January 1970 when Conrad applied for a Social Security number in Boston, Elliott said.

    During the 1970s, Randele worked as a manager at a country club outside Boston where he met his future wife not long after arriving in Boston and the couple married in 1982.

    Around that time, he started in the car business, selling Land Rovers and Volvos until he retired after nearly 40 years.

    What’s not clear yet is what happened to the money. The Marshals Service is investigating whether he lost it early through bad investments.

    While Randele and his wife, Kathy, lived most of their years in a pleasant Boston suburb, they filed for bankruptcy protection in 2014. She told Cleveland.com in November that her husband was a great man and has declined all interview requests.

    No one would have guessed that Randele, who was 71 when he died, was someone trying to hide from authorities.

    Among the many people, he had befriended over the years was an FBI agent in Boston, Elliott said.

    “He was just a gentle soul, you know, very polite, very well-spoken,” said Jerry Healy, who first met Randele at a Woburn, Massachusetts, dealership where they talked daily for years.

    Matt Kaplan, who managed two dealerships where Randele worked and golfed with him for many years, described him as a gentleman.

    “If he would have told us way back when, I don’t think we would have believed him because he wasn’t that kind of guy,” he said. “The man was different than the kid.”

    When Randele’s identity was first revealed, his friends couldn’t believe it. But now looking back, some things began to make sense, including his reluctance to talk about where he grew up or his extended family.

    “You know all the years I knew Tommy, I never heard him mention a sister or a mother or a brother or a father,” Healy said.

    “You could never pry anything from him,” said Brad Anthony, another close friend.

    Still, he said it’s almost impossible to believe. “It just seems so out of character for the Tom I knew,” he said.

  • Democrats Propose A Change To The Consequences For This Violent Crime

    Democrats Propose A Change To The Consequences For This Violent Crime

    Democratic lawmakers in Washington have introduced legislation that would lessen penalties for drive-by shootings.

    HB 1692, was proposed by Democratic Washington Reps. Tarra Simmons and David Hackney who say the bill is designed to promote “racial equity in the criminal justice system.”.

    HB 1692 would no longer consider drive-by shootings as a form of aggravated first-degree murder, which carries a mandatory sentence of life without parole.

    Simmons said that the aggravating factor for drive-by shootings has only been used once since it was classified as an aggravating factor in 1995.

    Simmons Kimonti Carter, 18, participated in a drive-by shooting in 1997 that resulted in the death of college student Corey Pittman and the wounding of two others. Carter was sentenced to 777 years in prison.

    “If he had been standing outside of the vehicle at the time, he would’ve faced 240-320 months in prison,” Simmons argued. “Instead, he was sentenced to life in prison with no opportunity for parole because of this law. This law’s history and application… is what we mean when we talk about systemic raicism.”

    HB 1692 would also apply to individuals already convicted of aggravated first-degree murder in the past if the drive-by shooting was the only aggravating factor, potentially setting Carter free if the bill passes.

  • COVID Positive Teen Busted At A Party And Pays The Price

    COVID Positive Teen Busted At A Party And Pays The Price

    A teenager in Australia could face up to two years in prison for continuing to party at a nightclub after he tested positive for COVID-19.

    Ralph MacIntosh, 19-years-old from Adelaide, was arrested Tuesday for failing to quarantine after he tested positive for COVID-19 and choosing to continue partying, according to a statement from the South Australia Police.

    “Today, Tuesday 28 December, SAPOL COVID-19 investigators from Licensing Enforcement Branch arrested a 19-year-old man from Kensington Park and charged him with failing to comply with directions under Section 28 of the Emergency Management Act,” the police said. “It will be alleged the man remained at a city nightclub and did not quarantine after being informed by SA Health that he had returned a positive COVID-19 test.”

    Failure to comply with health instructions during a major emergency constitutes a criminal offense, police said, therefore MacIntosh faces up to two years in prison or a $20,000 fine.

    MacIntosh was out partying at Loverboy, a nightclub in Adelaide, after having a positive COVID-19 test, subsequently, the club’s staff and around 150 patrons who came in close contact with MacIntosh were ordered to quarantine.

    MacIntosh is out of jail on bond and will appear before an Adelaide court in February.

    Australia has implemented mandatory quarantines for citizens that test positive for the COVID-19 virus. Many Australians have been sent to quarantine camps, where they are expected to stay for at least two weeks.

  • Florida Surgeon General Accuses Biden Administration Of Withholding COVID Treatment

    Florida Surgeon General Accuses Biden Administration Of Withholding COVID Treatment

    Florida’s surgeon general wrote a letter Tuesday accusing the Biden administration of withholding lifesaving COVID-19 treatments.

    Dr. Joseph Ladapo wrote to Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra accusing the federal government of “actively preventing the effective distribution” of monoclonal antibody treatments. The Biden administration recently suspended the distribution of two of the three available monoclonal antibody treatments due to evidence that they might not be as effective against the Omicron variant.

    Florida has been a leading distributor of monoclonal antibodies, which was one of the first effective treatments available to treat COVID-19 patients. Sotrovimab, one of the antibody treatments is still being distributed because it is known to be an effective treatment against Omicron.

    “The sudden suspension of multiple monoclonal antibody therapy treatments from distribution to Florida removes a health care provider’s ability to decide the best treatment options for their patients in this state,” Ladapo wrote in the letter. “This shortsightedness is especially evident given that the federal government effectively prohibited states from purchasing these monoclonal antibodies and serving their populations directly.”

    Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis previously went clashed with President Joe Biden when the administration cut the supply of monoclonal antibodies to southern states for “equity” reasons. The Biden team essentially accused Florida and some other states of hoarding too many of the treatments when they were needed elsewhere, even though those states were among the first to begin widespread use of the lifesaving treatments.

  • Congressman Gives Grim Prediction For The Border In 2022

    Congressman Gives Grim Prediction For The Border In 2022

    After visiting the border in Yuma, Arizona, Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., the head of the House Border Security Caucus, is warning that the U.S.-Mexico border is “overrun” could potentially worsen in 2022 if the Biden administration doesn’t change course.

    Biggs said that during his trip to the border in Yuma, he saw dozens of migrants pouring into the country in a short span of time, specifically through gaps in the border wall. The Biden administration stopped wall construction, even amid a remarkable surge in numbers of illegal migrants coming to the border.

    “What’s happening in Yuma right now, it’s basically overrun,” he said, adding how he saw groups of 30 or 40 migrants walking in at a time. “It’s just so casual. It’s not extraordinary anymore to illegally cross our borders.”

    Border numbers have continued to surge throughout fall and winter so far, after decreasing slightly from the more than 200,000 encounters of the summer. In November, agents reported 173,620 encounters at the southern border, a startling increase of 140 percent from the same time last year.

    The figures showed border encounters in November increased by nearly 10,000 from October, which saw an increase of nearly 130% over from October 2020. Biggs notes that many of the migrants who are encountered will be processed and quickly released into the interior of the United States.

    “You see it’s just absolutely open, and you know what’s happening in Yuma is what’s happening in Del Rio, the same thing happening in the Rio Grande on a daily basis,” he said.

    Yuma law enforcement officials say they are overwhelmed after a surge of illegal immigrants crossed through Yuma in a single week this month.

    Since October of this year, Customs and Border Protection reported close to 22,000 encounters in the Yuma Sector. One law enforcement official in the area said the situation is “absolute chaos.”

    Biggs said that migrants are exploiting gaps in the wall and fencing along the border. Other parts of the sector only have short Normandy fences, which are significantly easier for migrants to traverse.

    “It’s the gaps — it’s the gaps where you see this happening. And not just there — it’s everywhere I’ve been along the border. It’s the gaps in the fence.”

    Biggs believes the situation will get worse in 2022, and the border will likely see more traffic because the administration is not reversing course on its policies.

    “What has been the Biden response?” Biggs said. “[DHS Secretary Alejandro] Mayorkas has done nothing. [Vice President] Kamala Harris goes down there and does nothing, saying climate change is the root cause. I’ve talked to folks down in Colombia and Panama, and what you see there are big groups amassing down there, so you’re going to see more caravans coming up.”

    Biggs offers a number of suggestions for improving the situation including finishing the construction of the border wall, ending “catch-and-release” and increasing the number of migrants and illegal immigrants being returned to their countries.

    “I would say within a few months, you could solve this problem, but as soon as you start sending people back home, it just dries up a substantial amount of the traffic immediately.”

  • Texas Man Goes On A Christmas Day Rampage

    Texas Man Goes On A Christmas Day Rampage

    A man has been arrested after going on a Christmas crime spree in south Texas. Ingleside police answered a 911 call just before 10 p.m. Saturday from a man screaming that he was going to kill someone. When officers responded to the location, they heard a man yelling just before they were ambushed with gunfire.

    As officers shielded themselves from the gunfire, the suspect exited the residence, struck a neighbor in the head with a weapon while threatening to shoot him, and then stole a vehicle.

    Surrounding agencies were notified, and a short time later, the stolen vehicle was located at a nearby restaurant in Portland. The suspect had stolen another vehicle at gunpoint and that vehicle was found abandoned in the parking lot of a nearby retail store.

    Portland police contacted Ingleside officers and alerted them that the suspect had gone to a 24-hour emergency room, where he had barricaded himself inside with staff members.

    Officers from the Portland Police Department took the suspect into custody and recovered a weapon. The suspect was identified as 29-year-old Jorge Puente.

    The incident is still under active investigation. Authorities had initially obtained a warrant for aggravated assault on a public servant and aggravated robbery. Those two charges have been added to the list of other charges which includes four counts of aggravated robbery, seven counts of unlawful restraint exposed to serious bodily injury, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, evading arrest-vehicle, unlawful carrying a weapon, possession of marijuana, and possession of a controlled substance.

    “There will likely be more charges added for Mr. Puente, and we will be working closely with the district attorney to upgrade to attempted capital murder,” Ingleside PD’s statement reads.

    Puente is currently in custody at the San Patricio County Jail.

  • CDC Makes A Big Change To Quarantine Requirements For COVID Positive Patients

    CDC Makes A Big Change To Quarantine Requirements For COVID Positive Patients

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has updated its recommendation for the duration of time that people who test positive for COVID-19 should isolate themselves, shortening the window from ten days to five.

    “Given what we currently know about COVID-19 and the Omicron variant, CDC is shortening the recommended time for isolation from 10 days for people with COVID-19 to 5 days, if asymptomatic, followed by 5 days of wearing a mask when around others,” the CDC said in a statement Monday.

    The change came about because the science indicates the majority of COVID-19 transmission takes place early in the course of the illness, “generally in the 1-2 days prior to the onset of symptoms and the 2-3 days after,” the statement said.

    The CDC also updated the time it recommends those directly exposed to COVID-19, but who have not necessarily contracted the virus, isolate themselves. It recommends that unvaccinated individuals and those more than six months out from their second shot of an mRNA vaccine, typically Pfizer or Moderna, be advised to quarantine for five days, followed by five more days of strict mask use.

    Vaccinated individuals who have received a booster shot do not need to quarantine after being exposed but should wear a mask around other individuals for 10 days. If symptoms occur, the CDC recommends they quarantine until they receive a negative COVID-19 test result.

    Cases have surged as a result of the more transmissible Omicron variant, with the CDC acknowledging in the statement that two doses of an mRNA vaccine is about 35% effective in protecting individuals from infection, based on data from South Africa and the U.K. A booster shot raises protection against infection to 75%, the CDC said.

    “CDC’s updated recommendations for isolation and quarantine balance what we know about the spread of the virus and the protection provided by vaccination and booster doses,” CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said. “These updates ensure people can safely continue their daily lives.”

  • President Vladimir Putin Accuses America Of Brainwashing Ukrainians

    President Vladimir Putin Accuses America Of Brainwashing Ukrainians

    Russian President Vladimir Putin refused to say that war with Ukraine was no longer a possibility and accused the United States of brainwashing Ukrainians in a Thursday press conference.

    Putin alleged that NATO had instigated conflict by building up troops and weapons near Russia’s borders at an annual news conference Thursday. He also argued the addition of Ukraine to NATO was “unacceptable.”

    “We have clearly and precisely let them know that any further NATO expansion eastward is unacceptable,” he said. Putin’s government submitted security documents last week demanding that NATO refuse membership to Ukraine. Current Ukrainian leadership has repeatedly emphasized the importance of implementing a NATO Membership Action Plan, an important step in becoming a member of the alliance.

    “Is it us who are putting missiles near the U.S. borders?” Putin went on to say. “No, it’s the U.S. who came to our home with their missiles. They are already on the threshold of our home. Is it some excessive demand not to place any offensive systems near our home?”

    “How the Americans would respond if we put our missiles on the U.S. borders with Canada or Mexico?”

    When asked if he could guarantee that Russia will not invade Ukraine, Putin wanted guarantees from the West: “It’s you who must give us guarantees and give them immediately, now, and not have idle talk about it for decades.”

    He also accused the West of trying to brainwash Ukrainians and turn them against Russia. He said the West wanted to make Ukraine “anti-Russia, constantly beefed up with modern weapons and brainwashing the population.”

    Some American lawmakers have called on the Biden administration to send troops to Ukraine to help discourage a potential Russian invasion, however, President Joe Biden has said sending troops is not on the table.

  • Fauci Makes Ridiculous Comment About Wearing Masks On A Plane

    Fauci Makes Ridiculous Comment About Wearing Masks On A Plane

    National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director Dr. Anthony Fauci said that taking masks off while on an airplane is “not something we should even be considering.”

    Fauci was responding to a question from news host Jonathan Karl on a vaccine mandate for domestic air travel.

    “We want to make sure people keep their masks on. I think the idea of taking masks off, in my mind, is really not something we should even be considering,” Fauci said.

    “And of course, the airline CEOs were suggesting that — you know, that we may not — may no longer need a mask. I hear you loud and clearly, you disagree with that on an — on the airplane,” Karl responded.

    During a U.S. Senate panel hearing on Dec. 15, Southwest Airlines CEO Gary Kelly said that masks “don’t add much, if anything” to fight the spread of COVID-19 on airplanes.

    Fauci also suggested that a vaccine mandate for domestic air travel could be a motivation for individuals to get vaccinated.

    “A vaccine requirement for a person getting on the plane is just another level of getting people to have a mechanism that would spur them to get vaccinated; namely, you can’t get on a plane unless you’re vaccinated, which is just another one of the ways of getting requirements, whatever that might be,” Fauci said.

    “So I mean, anything that could get people more vaccinated would be welcome. But with regard to the spread of virus in the country, I mean, I think if you look at wearing a mask and the filtration on planes, things are reasonably safe,” he added.

    Fauci previously commented that he doesn’t think there will be a point where masks are unnecessary on airplanes.

    “I think when you’re dealing with a closed space, even though the filtration is good that you want to go that extra step,” Fauci said. “When you have people, you know you get a flight from Washington to San Francisco, it’s a well over a five hour flight.”

    “Even though you have a good filtration system, I still believe that masks are a prudent thing to do and we should be doing it,” he added.

  • Experts Warn Merck’s New COVID-19 Pill Could Trigger Another Variant

    Experts Warn Merck’s New COVID-19 Pill Could Trigger Another Variant

    Discussion surrounding Merck’s newly-authorized COVID-19 pill, molnupiravir, has primarily concerned the risk it might pose to pregnant women. But some experts are concerned that it could also lead to the outbreak of a new variant of the virus it’s designed to treat.

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted emergency use authorization to two antiviral pills to treat COVID-19 this week, one from Pfizer (paxlovid) and another from Merck (molnupiravir). The Pfizer EUA was generally lacking in controversy, but the authorization of molnupiravir was far more concerning.

    The FDA’s Antimicrobial Drugs Advisory Committee (ADAC) voted at the end of November to recommend authorization of molnupiravir, but it was by a narrow 13-10 margin. Even the members who voted in favor did so with qualifiers: some said the pill shouldn’t be given to pregnant women, while others were doubtful about its efficacy.

    “I don’t think I would want to take this drug, not knowing the effect it could have on my unborn child,” Dr. Roblena Walker, CEO of a public health non-profit EMAGAHA Inc. and ADAC member, said at the time. She voted yes.

    Some of the members who voted against recommending authorization were concerned that rather than help solve the pandemic with its 30% efficacy rate, molnupiravir could cause the breakout of a new variant.

    Molnupiravir works by triggering mutations in the virus of an infected individual, and those mutations go on to eventually kill the infection, Dr. Peter Weina said. Weina, an infectious disease specialist and director of the Defense Health Agency, is an ADAC member who voted against recommending authorization.

    “The drug works by mutating the organism, and this is an organism in which we have a lot of mutations creating problems for us already,” Weina said. “Just like influenza and just like a lot of viruses, there’s a baseline relatively high mutation rate in these viruses. The fact is that most mutations are probably lethal to the organism, but a couple of them are going to end up being beneficial for the organism, and we’ve seen that with the successive different variants that have come out.”

    Dr. James E.K. Hildreth, president of Meharry Medical College, said he voted no for the same reason: “I voted no. It was an easy vote for me to vote no. … There were more questions than answers. I think the potential for this drug to drive some very challenging variants into the public is a major, major concern.”

    “The number needed to treat for this particular drug was 34. What that means in real life is that you have to treat 34 people to get one good outcome. Another way of looking at it means that 33 people who get the drug aren’t necessarily gonna benefit from it,” Weina explained. “And those are 33 out of 34 people that are going to be mutating the virus that’s in them with no potential benefit.”

    “100% of the people that are getting the organism, their viruses are mutating. That’s how the drug works and it ends up killing the virus,” he continued. “But the problem of course is that we don’t know how many of those viruses may potentially get a mutation that causes yet another variant out there. Maybe a variant our vaccines have absolutely no efficacy against. So I think the potential risk out there is quite high.”

    Hildreth said the odds of a new variant mutating from molnupiravir use might be low, however, the potential downside is high. “Even if the probability is very low, 1 in 10,000 or 1 in 100,000, that this drug would induce an escape mutant for which the vaccines we have do not cover, that would be catastrophic for the whole world,” he said.

    The FDA’s own scientists aren’t as concerned though, and ultimately the agency decided after nearly a month of review to grant the pill its EUA. Patrick Harrington, the FDA’s senior virology reviewer, seemingly acknowledged the theoretical risk when addressing ADAC but downplayed it: “For molnupiravir to affect Sars-CoV-2 evolution beyond a treated individual, the variants would also have to be transmissible, and at this time we do not know if this is possible to a significant degree.”