Author: J.P. Knowles

Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested in July and charged with enticement of minors, sex trafficking of children, and purgery and because a judge determined that her risks of fleeing “are simply too great” she will remain in jail until her trial date of July 12, 2021.

She is best known as Jeffery Epstein’s long time girlfriend and partner in crime. Maxwell was in charge of recruiting and grooming young girls that would be abused sexually by Epstein and members of his inner circle.

Since her arrest, more information about Maxwell’s life has surfaced like her last public appearance before she went into hiding and her ultimate arrest.

A photo of Maxwell shows her at a charity for human sex trafficking victims in 2019. In the photo, you can see the British socialist at a London’s Cash and Rocket rally just one year before being federally charged with enticement of minors and sex trafficking of children as young as 14 years old.

Ghislaine Maxwell snapped at anti sex-trafficking event before arrest https://t.co/UwlZBid1hL

— The Sun (@TheSun_NI) October 10, 2020

It has also been reported that she used the charity event to drop in at Buckingham Palace and meet Prince Andrew, who was later named as a frequent flier on Epstein’s private jet.

It is understood that she even used the event to drop in at Buckingham Palace and meet close pal Prince Andrew. The rally raised money for three different charities, the child poverty group Sumbandila, the Helen Bamber Foundation, and the Dream For Future Africa Foundation.

The Helen Bamber Foundation was founded by the late human rights activist of the same name and works with individuals that have been subjected to “human trafficking.” The foundation’s website states that the survivors it helps include those who have forced “forced labor, sexual exploitation, gender-based, and ‘honor-based’ violence.”

The rich and famous and liberal have been threatening to leave the United States since before Trump was first elected president in 2016. Comedian Michael Loftus told “Fox & Friends Weekend” these are ego-driven, attention-seeking statements.

“They really think they’re that important,” Loftus said. “They really think we’re walking around going, ‘Wait, what? Springsteen’s going to leave? And Tommy Lee? Oh, I’m changing my vote!’”

Long time rock star Bruce Springsteen told The Daily Telegraph in a recent interview that he’ll “see you on the next plane” if President Trump is reelected. Tommy Lee, drummer for the rock band Motley Crue, told The Big Issue he would go “back to my Motherland.”

But according to Loftus, there is no way that Springsteen, Lee, or any celebrity for that matter, who vowed to flee in the past would ever actually follow through with it.

“We knew these celebrities were self-centered. We knew they were stupid. We just didn’t know how cowardly they were,” Loftus said.

“With Springsteen saying this, I guess it gives new meaning to ‘Born to Run’,” he joked.

Loftus added that it’s a good thing celebrities didn’t act this entitled during World War II by refusing to fight for their country on Omaha Beach after declaring that President Franklin D. Roosevelt is “not my president.”

“When celebrities declare they’re going to leave, we should have some new kind of candyman law. Meaning, if you declare it three times, you have to leave. Don’t let the door hit ya where the good Lord split ya,” he said.

These celebrities seem to think that their short-lived fame gives them the right to butt in on political matters. If these spoiled brats spend one week in the socialist countries they so desperately want to flee to they would be begging to come back to American where Trump is our President.

A senior advisor for the Trump campaign told Chris Wallace on “Fox News Sunday” that this week’s presidential debate between incumbent Donald Trump and Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden will see a different approach than that of the first debate back in September.

Wallace, who moderated the first debate, recalled the number of interruptions made by the opponents during that event and asked if the president would conduct himself similarly at the upcoming debate which has been scheduled for this Thursday.

“When you talk about style when you talk about approach, I do think that President Trump is going to give Joe Biden a little bit more room to explain himself on some of these issues,” said Jason Miller and referred to court-packing and whether or not Biden was referenced in newly discovered emails reported to have been exchanged involving son Hunter Biden and a Chinese energy company.

Miller stated that the debate’s focus on foreign policy would be the perfect setting to question Biden’s past support for “endless wars,” President Trump’s highly successful peace deals, and the authenticity of the Hunter Biden emails.

“I do think the president’s going to want to hear Joe Biden’s answer on some of these, and will definitely give all the time that Joe Biden wants to talk about packing the court,” Miller added, “I think he’s going to get it on Thursday.”

Biden has faced a lot of scrutiny for refusing to answer questions regarding his position on court-packing and even said American voters don’t deserve to know his opinion on the matter. Later, he told a Cincinnati new station that he is “not a fan” of the idea but then cut off the line of questioning by saying, “I don’t want to get off on that whole issue.”

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has announced that he will “make clear” his position on court-packing after the Senate votes on the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett.

“I’m going to make clear my position in the next several days when they vote on this nominee,” Biden said during an interview with Fox 2 Detroit, “but I’ve got to keep the focus on that.”

Biden later added that “when the [Senate Judiciary] Committee makes the decision, and the vote begins to occur, that’s when I’ll let you know my position.”

The former vice president argued that Republicans were already “packing the court” by filling the vacancy left by the late Justice Rith Bader Ginsburg by nominating Amy Coney Barrett. Democrats have said the Republicans are rushing the process too close to Election Day, with many Americans already voting.

The notion of court-packing has gained traction with Democrats since Republicans refused to hold hearings for then-President Barack Obama nominee Merrick Garland in 2016. Even though several Democrats in the presidential primary supported the idea of court-packing at the time, Biden rejected it.

Now that the subject has been brought up again in recent weeks, Biden has been very evasive on the subject. When asked if American voters deserved to know his stance on court-packing Biden responded, “No, they don’t.” That didn’t go over very well and last week he changed his tone and said voters “do have a right to know where I stand.”

However, in the interview, he still would not give a straight answer when asked if packing the court would be appropriate.

Biden would only say, “As you know, I’ve not been a fan of packing the court but what might happen is that we have to take a look at how this all works out and determine whether there’s other means by which we should take a look at how to make sure that this kind of thing doesn’t happen.”

Twitter has suspended the official Trump campaign account claiming that Trump’s team posted a tweet calling Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden a “liar” and adding a video about Hunter Biden’s business dealings which is a violation of its policy.

Twitter sent the account the standard message saying, “Your account has been locked. What Happened? We have determined that this account violated the Twitter Rules. Specifically, for: Violating our rules against posting private information. You may not publish or post other people’s private information without their express authorization and permission.” The social media giant also added the New York Post article was in violation of its “hacked materials policy.”

The Trump campaign tweet accused of violating the rules read, “Joe Biden is a liar who has been ripping off our country for years.”

The campaign also added a link to a video about the former vice president’s son Hunter Biden and his oversees business dealing, specifically referring to the recent report from the New York Post, which published emails that suggest Hunter introduced his father to a top executive at Ukrainian natural gas firm Burisma Holdings in 2015.

The revealing emails came from a hard drive of a laptop left abandoned at a computer repair shop. A copy of that hard drive made it’s way to Robert Costello, a lawyer for Rudy Giuliani, President Trump’s personal attorney.

Trump campaign communications director Time Murtagh was outraged by this action from Twitter saying, “This is election interference, plain and simple. For Twitter to lock the main account of the campaign of the President of the United States is a breathtaking level of political meddling and nothing short of an attempt to rig the election. Joe Biden’s Silicon Valley pals are aggressively blocking negative news stories about their guy and preventing voters from accessing important information. This is like something from communist China or Cuba, not the United States of America.”

“This is chilling censorship of a sitting President’s re-election campaign 19 days from an election, plain and simple,” added Trump campaign rapid response director Andrew Clark. “Twitter is interfering in the election and trying to stop the public from learning damning information about the Biden family’s corruption at all cost, but our campaign and our supporters will not be silenced.”

In an effort to bypass Twitter’s bias censorship the Trump campaign posted the entire New York Post article on its official website.

Former White House counselor to President Donald Trump, Kellyanne Conway, called out House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for her comments during a CNN interview.

Host Wolf Blitzer asked Pelosi during the interview about her refusal to consider a $1.8 trillion stimulus package put on the table by the Trump administration.

Pelosi accused Blitzer of being an “apologist” for Republican political positions and said, “You really don’t know what you’re talking about.”

The House Speaker also condemned Blitzer for allegedly putting the blame on her for the suffering of Americans during the economic downturn without considering the contents of Trump’s proposal or the Democrat’s counter-proposal.

Conway wrote, “She’s so rude. Thin Skin + Thick Skull = Bad Combo” along with a report on Pelosi and Blitzer’s heated interview.

Since becoming a part of Trump’s election team in 2016, Conway has loyally defended the president from criticism and pounced on political opponents who attack his name. During her time with Trump, a watchdog group claimed she violated The Hatch Act, which is a law that prohibits executive branch employees from using their position to influence election results or for political purposes, more than sixty times.

Conway announced that she would be leaving the White House back in August in order to focus on her family. Both her oldest daughter and husband George Conway, who founded the Lincoln Project formed to prevent the reelection of Donald Trump, have been very opinionated opponents of the president.

At the beginning of October, Claudia Conway announced on social media that her mother had tested positive for COVID-19 after attending an event at the White House Rose Garden after which at least eleven other attendees also tested positive for the virus.

Despite being quarantined ever since the event, Conway continues to show her support of Trump’s reelection campaign in the form of tweets.

The Washington and politics managing editor of the typically left-leaning media company Politico accused Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden of sounding “very much like Trump” after the former vice president said the only way he could lose November’s election was through “chicanery.”

Biden made a campaign stop in Pennsylvania on Saturday and told voters, “Make sure to vote because the only way we lose this is by the chicanery going on relative to polling places.”

Politico’s Blake Hounshell called out Biden’s statement in a Twitter post saying, “Biden sounding very much like Trump here.”

Before he left Pennsylvania, Biden backpedaled on his comment. He told reporters that his remarks were “taken a little out of context,” adding, “I’m going to accept the outcome of this election, period.”

“What I was referencing,” Biden continued, “is the attempts that are made to try to influence and scare people from voting. You should not pay attention to them.”

Biden and other fellow Democrats have been very vocal about how they believe President Trump will attempt to “steal” the victory if the results of the election didn’t come out in his favor.

The Biden campaign has made a huge effort to control Election Day by recruiting hundreds of lawyers and volunteers to oversee polling stations.

Trump rejecting election results and refusing to leave the White House has been an ongoing narrative of the Democrats for months now. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has attacked the president from every angle possible in hopes of removing him from presidency early. She tried to impeach him, threatened to fumigate him, and in her most recent move, has called on the 25th Amendment of the Constitution. The

Democrats are trying so hard to prevent an unfair election that they themselves have corrupted the results before they have even been determined.

Democratic Senator Chris Coons asked Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett if she would separate herself from any potential dispute before the court concerning the upcoming election, and while Barrett said she could not promise to do so at this time, she did, however, vow to take the matter “very seriously” should such a situation arise.

Coons brought up how President Trump has made claims of the election being a “scam” and the court would need nine justices to sort it out. With that information in mind, he asked Barrett if she would remove herself from such cases, if only for the sake of eliminating the appearance of bias.

“You’re right that the statute does require a justice or judge to recuse when there is an appearance of bias,” Barrett responded. “And what I will commit to every member of this committee, to the rest of the Senate, and to the American people, is that I will consider all factors that are relevant to that question – relevant to that question that requires recusal when there is an appearance of bias.”

Barrett pointed out that earlier in the hearing she discussed the Supreme Court’s recusal process, and how the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said that such decisions are made by that justice only after consulting with the other eight justices.

She continued, “And so I promise you that if I were confirmed and if an election dispute arises – you know both of which are ifs – that I would very seriously undertake that process and that I would consider every relevant factor.”

“I can’t commit to you right now for the reasons that we talked about before,” Barrett added, “but I do assure you of my integrity and I do assure you that I would take that question very seriously.”

Earlier in the hearing, Barrett addressed whether she would recuse herself from the controversial case of determining the future of the Affordable Care Act, amongst accusations made by Democrats that President Trump picked her based on her past criticism of the decision that upheld the law in 2012. It was then that she brought up the statute that governs recusal and the process of deliberating with other justices, and said that she could not commit to an answer right now “without short-circuiting that entire process.”

Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett faced a barrage of questions before the Senate Judiciary Committee during the second day of the hearing and observers noticed how she took everything they threw at her for hours on end without using any notes.

President Trump’s conservative pick relied solely on her memory to answer questions during the lengthy process.

After many hours of being interrogated on legal philosophy and recalling her own judgments and those of other courts, Texas Republican Senator John Cornyn wanted to know how Barrett prepared herself.

“You know most of us have multiple notebooks and notes and books and things like that in front of us,” Cornyn said referring to a note pad Barrett had on the table in front of her. “Can you hold up what you’ve been referring to in answering our questions?”

Cornyn wanted to know, “Is there anything on it?”

Barrett complied with a smile and held up the notepad for all to see and responded, “The letterhead that says ‘United States Senate.”

Suppressed laughter can then be heard echoing throughout the courtroom.

“That’s impressive,” Cornyn complimented.

Many viewers agreed and took to social media to praise the judge.

One user noted that “It’s common to write down questions since Senators often ask 12 in a row and expect complete answers to all.”

Another user added, “I am shooketh by how brilliant this woman is.”

Judge Barrett is using no notes. pic.twitter.com/zqZ6QGckOq

— Trish Turner (@caphilltrish) October 13, 2020

Amy Coney Barrett, just 48 years old, was nominated by President Trump last month to fill the vacant Supreme Court seat left by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg after her death.

Barrett served as a law clerk for the late Justice Antonin Scalia from 1998 to 1999. She later served as a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit since 2017.