Half of the 50 U.S. states came together and penned a letter to the Biden administration, arguing against its decision to reverse a Trump-era rule allowing energy firms to transport natural gas by rail.<\/p>\n

The 25-state coalition said that the proposed prohibition of natural gas rail transport would have \u201cdevastating effects\u201d on the economy and national security, according to the letter led by Republican Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry. The Monday letter was addressed to Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) Acting Administrator Tristan Brown.<\/p>\n

\u201cBiden\u2019s war on energy is a war on America\u2019s poor and working-class,\u201d Landry said in a statement Monday evening. \u201cIt is high time the Biden Administration put America first. Biden\u2019s environmental virtue-signaling is burdening American families and jeopardizing the safety and security of our homeland.\u201d<\/p>\n

Natural gas is the main source of electricity production in the U.S., accounting for nearly 40% of all generation according to the Energy Information Administration. The letter cited that greenhouse gas emissions have decreased 11.7% overall and 33.1% from electricity generation between 2005-2019.<\/p>\n

The states said emissions have decreased as reliance on natural gas has increased over the past decade. Relying on domestic natural gas production for electricity generation also makes the U.S. less dependent on foreign producers.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe growth in U.S. gas production is a geopolitical and economic asset, contributing to our national and global energy security,\u201d the letter stated.<\/p>\n

Last week, Russia invaded Ukraine leading to reports of missile attacks, shelling, deadly firefights in city streets, and an estimated 536 civilian casualties. Following the invasion, American fossil fuel industry groups called for the U.S. to boost domestic production in light of Russia\u2019s grip on global oil and gas markets.<\/p>\n

In November 2021, the PHMSA issued a notice that it would begin consideration of the rule opposed by Landry and his fellow attorneys general Monday. The Trump administration\u2019s rule allowing firms to send natural gas on railways went into effect in August 2020.<\/p>\n

Environmental groups which have opposed pipeline projects as well, argue that rail transport of natural gas is too dangerous.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Trump administration\u2019s reckless LNG rule risks explosions and fires in populated areas. We\u2019ll fight to protect our communities from this deadly threat,\u201d Emily Jeffers, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, said in a statement in July 2020. \u201cThe fossil fuel industry is desperate to cover its bad bet on fracking by trying to easily move more LNG. Our climate and communities will pay a terrible price if we let these explosive trains roll through our cities and towns.\u201d<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, top Biden administration energy regulators altered federal policy on approving natural gas pipelines on Feb. 17 adding more red tape to such projects.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Half of the 50 U.S. states came together and penned a letter to the Biden administration, arguing against its decision to reverse a Trump-era rule allowing energy firms to transport natural gas by rail. The 25-state coalition said that the proposed prohibition of natural gas rail transport would have \u201cdevastating effects\u201d on the economy and …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":5049,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5048","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-opinion"],"yoast_head":"\n